RE: AW: [Geopriv] Quickrandomcommentsondraft-ietf-geopriv-pdif-l o -profile-00

Oops, was not aware of the z dependent routing. 

Marc B

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Rosen [mailto:br@brianrosen.net] 
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 11:42 AM
To: Marc Berryman; James M. Polk; Henning Schulzrinne
Cc: GEOPRIV; Marc Linsner
Subject: Re: AW: [Geopriv]
Quickrandomcommentsondraft-ietf-geopriv-pdif-l o -profile-00

Henning has given examples where routing is dependent on z.  One is 
where you have an enterprise, which could be a university, which has its

own response capability.  The enterprise could occupy a portion of a 
high rise.

Sending both is aways fine with me, as long as you know what the data 
really means. Routing has to be fast and unambigous.  If you get 
multiple locations, however they are represented in the signaling, you 
need to choose one to route on.  To me, that would be the "orignal", 
civic or geo.  Of course we may have the problem of multiple locations 
because multiple entities have their own mechanisms.  We need ways of 
representing them so that we can decide which of them to use for 
routing.  This is a "truth in labeling" problem.

Brian

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv