Re: AW: [Geopriv] Quickrandomcommentsondraft-ietf-geopriv-pdif-l o -profile-00

At 10:38 PM 7/14/2005 -0400, Andrew Newton wrote:
>This is probably naive, but what the heck...

seems like something like this is what we're driving at for 
interoperability, unless we mandate everything has to be parsed in any 
order and always have the same result...

>Wouldn't these lead to loss of information (the floor from the civic)?
>
>This sounds like we need a very short, new schema.  One that allows
>this:
>
>     <rfc3825:data>
>       <gml:location>
>         ....
>       </gml:location>
>       <cl:civilAddress>
>         <cl:FLR>
>           ....
>         </cl:FLR>
>       </cl:civilAddress>
>     </rfc3825:data>
>
>In that way, all the information can be sent:
>   <gp:location-info>
>     <rfc3825:data>
>       ....
>     </rfc3825:data>
>     <cl:civilAddress>
>       ....
>     </cl:civilAddress>
>   </gp:location-info>
>
>>2) If you request different location types at different times then
>>the locations must be populated into different tuples.
>But then the usage rules would be need to be repeated for every
>location.
>
>-andy

cheers,
James

                                 *******************
                 Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented.

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv