IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Geopriv] Progressing the draft draft-thomson-geopriv-confidence-03

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 27 August 2013 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4B2311E83A1 for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:44:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.605
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.005, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KR+bJxGJCJ7y for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:44:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x22d.google.com (mail-we0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CFB711E8381 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:44:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id x54so4221152wes.4 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:44:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=GUQDH+SjGnu+PKq+GPn8XBK+1OgaOEAmJshpqWME4ws=; b=KkdvuY1KpRswHVn7LW/coY4MOZCbqS1NIX9At5ohauByqZEDSOC5ftMLMPuHeWW/cN J3Rh9FmebeFPiAgdxpTxUv7W+P3T5GFlmIDiFaG1zEUl03qLWeFl0Vbr+TMKGDmla97E bS5v3zYRirD6NRN0kwxfUJOemuIjibFvdo/XLe50ZmajtCB34Pkrz8Pc0a95PYWJx+7n 7QBfZWYWKX3dFR9EMBO6rXQbJMbZ0rl3WzY6//NRZGjwZVXJOa62YImViHQuBVfVaWEz Pe0+GZLi83MpCmCOSRYQ40/GDyyW7zlaiDAKTpU6m+joQl0HRcyGGSFsr4isVC6ut4vi Ry7Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.120.68 with SMTP id la4mr7230862wjb.33.1377625488146; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:44:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.28.39 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA91D90F-1A0B-440A-95AE-4CB49B639884@cdt.org>
References: <CACWXZj3kKwXTx85NLWMcum-21foHcESNKaiYSUELNfwM8UP5Vg@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXGT5jaGrMaA_6+DEJW2Nq3VVFALFH3HC6aoQFhJWrX9Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAOPrzE2dFNocXg_1OY1_rq0ZRznsMBzLKpviLphUOmfgtXBCNQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWs-XzzX6gh5J3NUfFBYvAVbr-F7+UmM_az3tZipy0qhw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOPrzE24CXRAfJtNtekLcbR7RiGqDjqAMvt7ftYR9=r8mBvomg@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnU+jcVx6=+i=OuA8=8U32HYpr92tJDXNPjXDhYBua1CDw@mail.gmail.com> <F58BBB12-65FC-44B8-AB8B-DB5FCB7B2F7B@cs.columbia.edu> <CABkgnnVu4mB0956+QRcgJCRCMWsFCYUq2zwR-Xu2BpRDnfZeUA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUC57BuOGYesnkxxpMwsYjFAoFfMQ8xe=uYTpSsS1UESA@mail.gmail.com> <7273FCC2-82ED-48DD-8FBF-E8D8A8085244@cs.columbia.edu> <CABkgnnX5AJRe+yneouGQ0dWkPfOcxgj=2baxku6tfkvU6c-vmw@mail.gmail.com> <FBD5AAFFD0978846BF6D3FAB4C892ACC3A4CAF@SEA-EXMB-2.telecomsys.com> <CABkgnnXGP6ZkojE-iEd8HeMgHLqJ7yvHe4yNQzDdagke=jHPsg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMqK8yKUz0uuHSCPXiS0OKSETzN2qVJuNJCZtPACW4XjBkk6zA@mail.gmail.com> <CA91D90F-1A0B-440A-95AE-4CB49B639884@cdt.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 10:44:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnW7UCMpp8ZBLFad+P9iqRTAQKMOHLB9q7WqPmb9SQWj9Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Alissa Cooper <acooper@cdt.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: GEOPRIV WG <geopriv@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] Progressing the draft draft-thomson-geopriv-confidence-03
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:44:49 -0000

On 26 August 2013 02:53, Alissa Cooper <acooper@cdt.org> wrote:
> I think these are both obviously in scope of our charter, so if the authors want to rev them, we can do a consensus call for WG adoption and see what we get. It would be helpful to get a sense of who is willing to review these drafts if we do adopt them.

I'm certainly able to update these documents if the WG is happy to
proceed with them.

I've revived -uncertainty.  I'm having a little trouble with the tools
for -confidence, but I'll get that sorted out eventually.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email