Re: [Geopriv] Progressing the draft draft-thomson-geopriv-confidence-03

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 31 July 2013 12:34 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED3211E81A3 for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.407
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.407 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.193, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iINFvXtVhu-F for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:34:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com (mail-wg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F35F11E8192 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id a12so528674wgh.18 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=xHUBBwbe8NpwYYzPLNtqiDqdyhvDwjsOlSaMqNAkzNM=; b=YWqz8vNRK4qSPhNzoqxEWguiW/Azz7VTXjq9BIHzVv899B8zZnQ8fkL0wa5Zu2nzSI uhPKoB9LVIh3f2PbG4k/oczynCZhxy3bD+KqGr+F1j/LklTUnPJiVcm9sTJtPW8ANRuD 2YLjzWgMBZH9Q5jfOufTb9I2eJI+R9wS8nvNKNltJbp05N2sD5ZAEl9DmxIq2EUGOBab h9dOh4aB18aqT2rp0G5de24ommsUN6Ei1WRAT8JtdPIgrH8YmEAFLRaTeg6dRV+SQEtx rzLu8Z3Hsc/bbKviHn4sRCrb06oISrT+PSh3LeylSTWjaouuM1ANC9HS/3Zi4fgQr5ii GJsg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.73.68 with SMTP id j4mr4193077wiv.10.1375273920356; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.60.46 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXGT5jaGrMaA_6+DEJW2Nq3VVFALFH3HC6aoQFhJWrX9Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACWXZj3kKwXTx85NLWMcum-21foHcESNKaiYSUELNfwM8UP5Vg@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXGT5jaGrMaA_6+DEJW2Nq3VVFALFH3HC6aoQFhJWrX9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:32:00 +0200
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXG6GxEyKd+3o8DykAnN75uOf4kLRi145ktXmAec=jdYw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: GEOPRIV WG <geopriv@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] Progressing the draft draft-thomson-geopriv-confidence-03
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 12:34:46 -0000

I have recovered my copy of -uncertainty and put it up on github.  I
am happy to accept contributions.

https://github.com/martinthomson/drafts

I don't have the source for -confidence, which got lost when I moved,
but James is looking into this.  At worst, I can easily recreate this
(it's just a little tedious to do so).

On 31 July 2013 14:10, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm prepared to revive these drafts if there is sufficient interest in
> doing so.  Either or both.
>
> Both are, in my opinion at least, in a fairly good state.  Uncertainty
> has actually had a lot of review.
>
> On 31 July 2013 13:56, Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Martin,
>>
>> The German regulator requires the confidence to be sent to the PSAP.  The
>> regulator requirements are based on the ETSI specification, where confidence
>> is required, too.
>>
>> We do not have a confidence element in PIDF-LO today. Your draft
>> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-geopriv-confidence-03.txt  proposes
>> this but it is currently expired. Is it possible for you to submit the
>> document again? I think this time we have a clear usecase for it.
>> Publishing this draft as an RFC would avoid national and maybe incompatible
>> extensions.
>>
>> In this context I think the draft
>> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-geopriv-uncertainty-07.txt is also a
>> very useful document to educate people on how to use uncertainty and
>> confidence and that tey are used in the wrond way. I think it would be
>> usefull to get it published.
>>
>> Please find below the link to the German regulatory requirements including
>> the requirement to send the confidence (Tables I4-A-5 and I4-A-7).
>> Unfortunately, I couldn't find an english version.
>> http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Sachgebiete/Telekommunikation/Unternehmen_Institutionen/Notruf/TRNotruf.pdf;jsessionid=9741B92CDD3B4D7F25572343E81727F5?__blob=publicationFile&v=2
>>
>> Thank you
>> Laura