Re: [Geopriv] Progressing the draft draft-thomson-geopriv-confidence-03

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 31 July 2013 12:51 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5850A21F93E4 for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.422
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.422 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.178, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 96nhKzaJ9E14 for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A953C11E80E4 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:50:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id hr7so602980wib.12 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=xz/5w6c2JR0nEW4a/LjkvOArRHoXHukShmAFNKHtfAc=; b=sXDUl4wz2lt4ZzGi5JApW5fYSbmslm8lJ+qv8AlaIgfGmdsBHCqw3nPqbj+6wKwWs/ C7utXXvbtCuQ71n9ijsYzY9A/3WblE+U4LNhPfbnntier8Fdk1K6FA4w+0w4oVzBqyrx IPx8PbNxUO4B8MLwn1WfCBEElNemtEELonoizyvFbGVdiEOJ11h/109kRbbQHwR+GuFz e3tgwO0FOKBFfL7NBRTiJSTFVkHedwB81ye+UdVUMIaov6Az0bP5N0VL6d3UsvBckM3z a1Q8aqLx10vVSwypmZpBNOyUW/0TKkEn12vjH9fPnzRCYOoHgC2MGKE2HhWn0KOoTbxo xu0w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.39.236 with SMTP id s12mr4219251wik.14.1375275049742; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.60.46 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXG6GxEyKd+3o8DykAnN75uOf4kLRi145ktXmAec=jdYw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACWXZj3kKwXTx85NLWMcum-21foHcESNKaiYSUELNfwM8UP5Vg@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXGT5jaGrMaA_6+DEJW2Nq3VVFALFH3HC6aoQFhJWrX9Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXG6GxEyKd+3o8DykAnN75uOf4kLRi145ktXmAec=jdYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:50:49 +0200
Message-ID: <CABkgnnV_LtxRGjTrpdj0mqpGymL0m6UjyjyOt3ErM=LG5O0K2A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: GEOPRIV WG <geopriv@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] Progressing the draft draft-thomson-geopriv-confidence-03
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 12:51:10 -0000

Laura found me the source.  Thanks Laura.  (I know that I should have
thought to ask my favorite search engine before looking foolish and
making people do my work for me.)

On 31 July 2013 14:32, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have recovered my copy of -uncertainty and put it up on github.  I
> am happy to accept contributions.
>
> https://github.com/martinthomson/drafts
>
> I don't have the source for -confidence, which got lost when I moved,
> but James is looking into this.  At worst, I can easily recreate this
> (it's just a little tedious to do so).
>
> On 31 July 2013 14:10, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm prepared to revive these drafts if there is sufficient interest in
>> doing so.  Either or both.
>>
>> Both are, in my opinion at least, in a fairly good state.  Uncertainty
>> has actually had a lot of review.
>>
>> On 31 July 2013 13:56, Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> Martin,
>>>
>>> The German regulator requires the confidence to be sent to the PSAP.  The
>>> regulator requirements are based on the ETSI specification, where confidence
>>> is required, too.
>>>
>>> We do not have a confidence element in PIDF-LO today. Your draft
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-geopriv-confidence-03.txt  proposes
>>> this but it is currently expired. Is it possible for you to submit the
>>> document again? I think this time we have a clear usecase for it.
>>> Publishing this draft as an RFC would avoid national and maybe incompatible
>>> extensions.
>>>
>>> In this context I think the draft
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-geopriv-uncertainty-07.txt is also a
>>> very useful document to educate people on how to use uncertainty and
>>> confidence and that tey are used in the wrond way. I think it would be
>>> usefull to get it published.
>>>
>>> Please find below the link to the German regulatory requirements including
>>> the requirement to send the confidence (Tables I4-A-5 and I4-A-7).
>>> Unfortunately, I couldn't find an english version.
>>> http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Sachgebiete/Telekommunikation/Unternehmen_Institutionen/Notruf/TRNotruf.pdf;jsessionid=9741B92CDD3B4D7F25572343E81727F5?__blob=publicationFile&v=2
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>> Laura