IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Geopriv] Progressing the draft draft-thomson-geopriv-confidence-03

James Winterbottom <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com> Wed, 31 July 2013 12:39 UTC

Return-Path: <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4031021F9644 for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:39:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CBYbLOzsiU6Q for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22a.google.com (mail-pd0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE1A821F9DF3 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f170.google.com with SMTP id x10so705025pdj.29 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date :to; bh=e6ul0wp7AyvViwJ3JfxJQQxPLgvG/F+d66glTtweoaQ=; b=e3cuRP1b2v2WSf7MaMxlYgYUHm75vVmi22mN/J0CJqcpUmE5Mev3uN18Z7zKdKE4n5 DUOEsLdZ9YNLYxxoJ3DxIBgJL/HTOCrMhFIsfcPFAckCOwl4CXdTXaz8ewShnrc/+i60 jEIukXPf3nce8GN6vjqiVMI+A/wDjXmBwcc1TuWHcINJguItSEYajNBH/0ussfZW9nO2 c0oZh/hlJXGqhgfEpnyRW7J/oilO4KhlRikNT4m+wZ99Pk0NMWrm5T4/xc/WXWayzAZ7 tU70MEU7pbu+7F325LwXoU5bXFjFPfWfBfrNgsL8NZagqGHNnPmsbugQ/R0yapymIXOU qHvw==
X-Received: by 10.66.144.104 with SMTP id sl8mr81596827pab.9.1375274228556; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.14] (124-170-227-29.dyn.iinet.net.au. [124.170.227.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id kc8sm1957954pbc.18.2013.07.31.05.37.06 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
References: <CACWXZj3kKwXTx85NLWMcum-21foHcESNKaiYSUELNfwM8UP5Vg@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXGT5jaGrMaA_6+DEJW2Nq3VVFALFH3HC6aoQFhJWrX9Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXG6GxEyKd+3o8DykAnN75uOf4kLRi145ktXmAec=jdYw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXG6GxEyKd+3o8DykAnN75uOf4kLRi145ktXmAec=jdYw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5D7E13F9-46B1-4A5B-9475-A80018E61EDC@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10A523)
From: James Winterbottom <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 22:37:04 +1000
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: GEOPRIV WG <geopriv@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] Progressing the draft draft-thomson-geopriv-confidence-03
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 12:39:07 -0000

I hope to get this tomorrow.

Sent from my iPad

On 31/07/2013, at 10:32 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have recovered my copy of -uncertainty and put it up on github.  I
> am happy to accept contributions.
> 
> https://github.com/martinthomson/drafts
> 
> I don't have the source for -confidence, which got lost when I moved,
> but James is looking into this.  At worst, I can easily recreate this
> (it's just a little tedious to do so).
> 
> On 31 July 2013 14:10, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm prepared to revive these drafts if there is sufficient interest in
>> doing so.  Either or both.
>> 
>> Both are, in my opinion at least, in a fairly good state.  Uncertainty
>> has actually had a lot of review.
>> 
>> On 31 July 2013 13:56, Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> Martin,
>>> 
>>> The German regulator requires the confidence to be sent to the PSAP.  The
>>> regulator requirements are based on the ETSI specification, where confidence
>>> is required, too.
>>> 
>>> We do not have a confidence element in PIDF-LO today. Your draft
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-geopriv-confidence-03.txt  proposes
>>> this but it is currently expired. Is it possible for you to submit the
>>> document again? I think this time we have a clear usecase for it.
>>> Publishing this draft as an RFC would avoid national and maybe incompatible
>>> extensions.
>>> 
>>> In this context I think the draft
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-geopriv-uncertainty-07.txt is also a
>>> very useful document to educate people on how to use uncertainty and
>>> confidence and that tey are used in the wrond way. I think it would be
>>> usefull to get it published.
>>> 
>>> Please find below the link to the German regulatory requirements including
>>> the requirement to send the confidence (Tables I4-A-5 and I4-A-7).
>>> Unfortunately, I couldn't find an english version.
>>> http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Sachgebiete/Telekommunikation/Unternehmen_Institutionen/Notruf/TRNotruf.pdf;jsessionid=9741B92CDD3B4D7F25572343E81727F5?__blob=publicationFile&v=2
>>> 
>>> Thank you
>>> Laura
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email