IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Geopriv] Progressing the draft draft-thomson-geopriv-confidence-03

James Winterbottom <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com> Wed, 31 July 2013 12:05 UTC

Return-Path: <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B209221E80E5 for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QCccQLHot9tm for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-x22a.google.com (mail-pb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBFE21E80FF for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id un15so152801pbc.15 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date :to; bh=NAwOiN7NavSmCwssue6s7/kPHAcwJiqO/AaNTx1JWik=; b=jgPONHWWfa7joEiDd7WYtEbSb01oJ7WJ6f049Os6LSTvk42JEoXEoP/RZm/ZD8VOxd +Frbwfh4rDiLZfHaJtas/p8zf3qK7BkURIxWPIixw6Ybn6DpajiFfre0d2h5pvIagDzz MSuXUuGk89y/66QPTctbJrbvPJyGeCtxbcAfqnPfMjqYoPaOvEATV4979OGAmSExfoLh 1ika0M2ITQfxHMs8h9OOWHrhESigFoBf9Ejy9iRo9W+mLDBZVmxtTGyDyzm/YuIhQ1EE Off5eEVZLS1U+0vq1fUrj2DLp09mlynhxojSmFWhWnLVw8EB+GaAzD3yQjgPYYHPDhB7 He/g==
X-Received: by 10.66.118.163 with SMTP id kn3mr81382780pab.165.1375272319243; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:05:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.14] (124-170-227-29.dyn.iinet.net.au. [124.170.227.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id py4sm1809681pbc.14.2013.07.31.05.05.16 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:05:18 -0700 (PDT)
References: <CACWXZj3kKwXTx85NLWMcum-21foHcESNKaiYSUELNfwM8UP5Vg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <CACWXZj3kKwXTx85NLWMcum-21foHcESNKaiYSUELNfwM8UP5Vg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-EC9ACD3E-4965-4386-A616-9A3E7367DCE5"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <2473EA8B-4A11-459A-A003-842A3CCA8BFD@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10A523)
From: James Winterbottom <a.james.winterbottom@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 22:04:53 +1000
To: Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com>
Cc: "geopriv@ietf.org" <geopriv@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] Progressing the draft draft-thomson-geopriv-confidence-03
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 12:05:29 -0000

Hi Laura,

Several organisations would like to confidence in PIDF-LO and I raised this same question earlier this year. I think that this draft needs to move forward but unless we get enough support it won't be adopted as work by geopriv.

Cheers
James

Sent from my iPad

On 31/07/2013, at 9:56 PM, Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Martin,
> 
> The German regulator requires the confidence to be sent to the PSAP.  The regulator requirements are based on the ETSI specification, where confidence is required, too. 
> 
> We do not have a confidence element in PIDF-LO today. Your draft  http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-geopriv-confidence-03.txt  proposes this but it is currently expired. Is it possible for you to submit the document again? I think this time we have a clear usecase for it.  Publishing this draft as an RFC would avoid national and maybe incompatible extensions.
>   
> In this context I think the draft http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-geopriv-uncertainty-07.txt is also a very useful document to educate people on how to use uncertainty and confidence and that tey are used in the wrond way. I think it would be usefull to get it published. 
> 
> Please find below the link to the German regulatory requirements including the requirement to send the confidence (Tables I4-A-5 and I4-A-7). Unfortunately, I couldn't find an english version. 
> http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Sachgebiete/Telekommunikation/Unternehmen_Institutionen/Notruf/TRNotruf.pdf;jsessionid=9741B92CDD3B4D7F25572343E81727F5?__blob=publicationFile&v=2
> 
> Thank you
> Laura
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email