Re: [hiprg] 回复:Re: HIPRG charter discussion

Andrei Gurtov <gurtov@hiit.fi> Fri, 30 September 2011 09:33 UTC

Return-Path: <gurtov@hiit.fi>
X-Original-To: hiprg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hiprg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F74221F8B7F for <hiprg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 02:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.373
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.373 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.226, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SARE_SUB_ENC_UTF8=0.152]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i9qkxoylIrN3 for <hiprg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 02:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from argo.otaverkko.fi (argo.otaverkko.fi [212.68.0.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A32CA21F8ACA for <hiprg@irtf.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 02:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.201.85] (gw1.panoulu.net [212.50.147.101]) by argo.otaverkko.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id C097825F818; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:36:14 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4E858D8E.2000405@hiit.fi>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:36:14 +0300
From: Andrei Gurtov <gurtov@hiit.fi>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: xuxiaohu 41208 <xuxh@huawei.com>
References: <7CC566635CFE364D87DC5803D4712A6C4CEED71928@XCH-NW-10V.nw.nos.boeing.com> <005601cc24c4$99060400$cb120c00$@com> <4DF72D48.10007@hiit.fi> <fd2bc5f4201d.201dfd2bc5f4@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <fd2bc5f4201d.201dfd2bc5f4@huawei.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: hiprg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [hiprg] =?utf-8?b?5Zue5aSNOlJlOiAgSElQUkcgY2hhcnRlciBkaXNjdXNz?= =?utf-8?q?ion?=
X-BeenThere: hiprg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Host Identity Protocol \(HIP\) Research Group" <hiprg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hiprg>, <mailto:hiprg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/hiprg>
List-Post: <mailto:hiprg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hiprg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hiprg>, <mailto:hiprg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:33:23 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Hi,

Are you planning to present something at Taipei HIPRG?

BR
Andrei

On 16.6.2011 6:56, xuxiaohu 41208 wrote:
> ----- 原邮件 ----- 发件人: Andrei Gurtov <gurtov@hiit.fi> 日期: 星期二, 六月 14
> 日, 2011 下午6:21 主题: Re: [hiprg] HIPRG charter discussion 收件人: Xu
> Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com> 抄送: "'Henderson, Thomas R'"
> <thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com>om>, hiprg@irtf.org,
> irtf-chair@irsg.org
> 
>> 
>> Hei Xiaohu,
>> 
>> That's an interesting topic, but there should be interest of
>> several organizations to discuss and develop it jointly at HIPRG.
>> Can you thinkof others who would be willing to commit to this
>> topic for a coupleyears? Maybe China mobile, Tsinghua
>> University?
> 
> Hi Andrei,
> 
> Thanks for your suggestion and reminder. I will discuss about this
> with several mobile service providers and universities which had
> shown me their interests on this topic before.
> 
> Best regards, Xiaohu
> 
>> 
>> Andrei
>> 
>> Xu Xiaohu wrote:
>>> Hi Tom and all,
>>> 
>>> I propose to consider taking the hierarchical HIT research as a
>>> 
>> new charter
>>> item. IMHO, there are at least two major benefits of using
>> hierarchical HITs
>>> from the commercial deployment perspectives:
>>> 
>>> First, the ID/HIT registration management service and the
>>> ID-to-
>> Locator> mapping service corresponding to the hierarchical HITs 
>> could be run in a
>>> hierarchical manner. In other words, such global mobility
>> management service
>>> systems could be operated by different countries and different
>>> 
>> operators> with clear administrative domain boundaries and 
>> reasonable business models,
>>> just like the telephone number space in the telephone network
>> and the home
>>> address space in the mobile IP network. In addition, the
>> existing DNS
>>> infrastructure doesn't need to be changed largely. That's to
>> say, HITs of
>>> the HIP hosts could be stored directly as their corresponding
>> AAAA RRs in
>>> the existing DNS infrastructure.
>>> 
>>> Second, the usage of hierarchical HITs will ease the transition
>>> 
>> for HIP. For
>>> instance, legacy IPv6 hosts could access mobile HIP hosts via
>> provider-owned
>>> HIP proxy devices (just as home agents in the mobile IP
>>> network)
>> since the
>>> hierarchical HITs could be routable in the Internet. On the
>> contrary,> ORCHIDs are not routable in the Internet since there
>> is no reasonable
>>> business motivation for operators to deploy HIP proxy devices
>> for such flat
>>> identifiers.
>>> 
>>> There has been some proposals and presentations discussing
>>> about hierarchical HITs in HIPRG before as follows: 
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-hip-hierarchical-02 
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kuptsov-hhit-02 
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-rangi-04
>>> 
>>> By the way, we have implemented the RANGI 
>>> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-rangi-04) prototype which
>>> 
>> uses a
>>> hierarchical and cryptographic host IDs with
>>> delegation-oriented
>> structure.> Hope we could have a chance to show the
>> implementation details and
>>> verification results at the forthcoming IETF meeting in Quebec
>>> City.
>>> 
>>> Best regards, Xiaohu
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> -----邮件原件----- 发件人: hiprg-bounces@irtf.org
>>>> [mailto:hiprg-bounces@irtf.org] 代表 Henderson, Thomas R 发送时间:
>>>> 2011年6月6日 22:49 收件人: hiprg@irtf.org 抄送:
>>>> 'irtf-chair@irsg.org' 主题: [hiprg] HIPRG charter discussion
>>>> 
>>>> With the completion of the experiment report (our main RG
>> charter item
>>> since
>>>> the RG's inception), I would like to ask about future
>> directions of the
>>> RG.
>>>> Outside of completing our current RG drafts, we need to try
>>>> to
>> define some
>>>> new collaborative work items and define what role the RG will
>>>> play
>>> relative to
>>>> the WG.
>>>> 
>>>> These work items should ideally satisfy the following
>>>> criteria: - is the research area clear and relevant for the
>>>> Internet
>> community and
>>> for
>>>> HIP in particular?  What are the expected outcomes and
>>>> impact? - will the RG foster work that would not be done
>>>> otherwise?
>> For instance,
>>>> participation drawn from more than a single institution or
>> country.  Can
>>> we
>>>> try to identify individuals for this anticipated
>>>> participation?
>>>> 
>>>> We can have some discussion of this at the next meeting but I
>>>> 
>> would like
>>> to see
>>>> whether we can start identifying some topics on the list
>>>> before the
>>> meeting.
>>>> - Tom _______________________________________________ hiprg
>>>> mailing list hiprg@irtf.org 
>>>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hiprg
>>> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk6FjY4ACgkQP7jp0uceFkRk5QCgoI4dpcCzkZaw+Juw9fAbNEw6
55oAnjmvAmfYR21qpep732YgCA4YAw+I
=PrM2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----