IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] deflate-stream and masking

Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com> Wed, 20 July 2011 20:00 UTC

Return-Path: <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C33E21F8AFD for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c126bI-Lg+Xj for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (mail2.microsoft.com [131.107.115.215]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D59EC21F87D3 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.7.153) by TK5-EXGWY-E802.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:00:06 -0700
Received: from TK5EX14MLTW652.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com (157.54.71.68) by TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.7.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.2; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:00:06 -0700
Received: from TK5EX14MBXW605.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([169.254.5.188]) by TK5EX14MLTW652.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.71.68]) with mapi id 14.01.0289.008; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:00:05 -0700
From: Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Thread-Topic: [hybi] deflate-stream and masking
Thread-Index: AQHMLxP1nkJD1ozqQE+VMnXnl/8/EpT1IlcAgAB5rICAAIuOAIAABTwAgAAHcACAAA15gIAAAZaA//+NOzA=
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:00:05 +0000
Message-ID: <CA566BAEAD6B3F4E8B5C5C4F61710C114038FBE3@TK5EX14MBXW605.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
References: <BANLkTi=UVMAd1nER6mRBe7zoD29CSbCkGA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH_y2NFMdr1ZU2dfy9mCRepZc2R_hnzg0oa3kYPKhWY-FX_8Og@mail.gmail.com> <CAE8AN_V-P2L0mVwjPQYxAypJ67=QWKAhWnDqrM_XmDQXjJbEHA@mail.gmail.com> <CAP992=HmZM9H2i+rFLVNrJVzfQT2qSPzWRm4gQXc2wTQ8fdBTA@mail.gmail.com> <00b801cc470a$d2d5e520$7881af60$@noemax.com> <CAP992=Gvz7CT=fZSX=t_7J3YAGF7kKsA9a6M0UQJP3HXxMBANQ@mail.gmail.com> <1311190993.1862.135.camel@ds9> <4E273125.8070503@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4E273125.8070503@stpeter.im>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] deflate-stream and masking
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:00:11 -0000

<As individual>

That is my reading as well. 

<as chair>

Patrick, would you be able to own that separate spec?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: hybi-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hybi-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Peter Saint-Andre
> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 12:49
> To: Patrick McManus
> Cc: Hybi
> Subject: Re: [hybi] deflate-stream and masking
> 
> <hat type='individual'/>
> 
> On 7/20/11 1:43 PM, Patrick McManus wrote:
> 
> > As for compression, the most productive thing to do seems to me to be
> > to define in a separate draft deflate-frame and push it through the
> > adoption/standardization process. No matter what is defined the
> > extensions mechanism should (and does!) provide a mechanism for
> > migration for any sensible protocol implementations.
> >
> > While I don't want to go to the mat for deflate-stream it certainly
> > has a number of use cases where it does well - most downstream traffic
> > of> tiny-sized messages, and large upstream messages - so I'm not in
> > the camp of "just throw it out".
> 
> My reading of the discussion is that people don't necessarily want to throw out
> deflate-stream, but they don't think it belongs in the base spec and they would
> prefer to see it defined in a separate draft, just as you propose for deflate-frame.
> 
> Peter
> 
> --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://stpeter.im/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> hybi mailing list
> hybi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email