Re: [I18ndir] Just uploaded draft-bray-unichars-03

[Tim Bray <[e-mail]>]

 I’d just like to remark that this has been a pleasant surprise. I think
Paul and I expected one of two reactions:


   1. No, we don’t need this kind of a document.
   2. Yeah, OK, no big deal, it’s simple enough.


Instead we are heading for an -04 that is really immensely better than the
-00. Thanks to everyone.

On Sep 8, 2023 at 12:38:11 PM, Tim Bray <[e-mail]> wrote:

> See https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bray-unichars-03.html
>
> A bunch of minor corrections and improvements, thanks to everyone for
> that, especially James Manger for noticing that the ABNF was entirely wrong
> in one place.
>
> The word “useless” has been replaced by “legacy”.
>
> I think the feedback was pretty clear that the draft needed to be more
> opinionated; just because we document the existence of the default JSON
> repertoire (“all the code points”) doesn’t mean that anyone should use it
> in the present or future. So, introduced a new section “Refining Character
> Repertoires” to highlight those issues and offer a suggestion.
>
>
>