IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal development process

Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> Mon, 19 January 2015 15:53 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F4F51B2AB0 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 07:53:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xCghIdwush4k for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 07:53:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-x232.google.com (mail-pd0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 384951B29B1 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 07:53:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f178.google.com with SMTP id r10so37159264pdi.9 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 07:53:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=J5Iw14pCVAUnRL5YFD9kPCN7AKRxkBO+VZTYr/A9v/M=; b=Yb2GmYwbgNtVAAnFjcUHysPDp3FjV7X16bprrDUU/iLxnab1IlvUX3V0D6z0jg2FV3 sDPjkZ4d7VlKhyl5xVJGhs4Rk0mYNBkXGFeH2g/+iW5ZVTlMTRDhzd0LJToHTvFiuomr F8hsBNi65dhjMyzCs8gAhBrQ16uWVMVosPx41ZspagfurxE3TGDAlwy9POMSFUrbbVgP Vw15RSD2cIMJbZvUULHsayQaDjqrlroCytXVMo6JaX1XbaWBvfNfDr7Z3pceen/cvbSN dnGf8Jq/RopyKLM0YEKEU+acBy376RWwjE3+DlliJL9I3yCGOeUhTyFAZm1Upt3ZtGwf T9jA==
X-Received: by 10.68.137.98 with SMTP id qh2mr7622076pbb.81.1421682822596; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 07:53:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.132] (c-71-227-237-49.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [71.227.237.49]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cm10sm712803pad.46.2015.01.19.07.53.40 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Jan 2015 07:53:40 -0800 (PST)
References: <C172BBB7-9BA4-4BA7-848C-C7FE5B66CBF7@cooperw.in>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <C172BBB7-9BA4-4BA7-848C-C7FE5B66CBF7@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-8A933D0D-5F1D-4BE6-A4F6-30760DE707DB"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <8B1EC865-AD1F-4165-8C3A-258BA18C4823@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12B440)
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 07:53:38 -0800
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/FMP6xuOttxBDJJgNTmMhhuID8LQ>
Cc: "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal development process
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:53:49 -0000

I would note that both of the concerns listed are under consideration by the IAOC. Also, the proposals from the other communities also include mention of both items. So while it is fair to say that the issues require more work, I do not believe they are process concerns in this WG. 



> On Jan 19, 2015, at 6:33 AM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
> 
> After draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response was submitted to the ICG, the ICG received the following comment: http://forum.icann.org/lists/icg-forum/msg00017.html
> _______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email