IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal development process

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 26 January 2015 17:04 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C882C1ACCEE for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:04:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cRoW3JJYjgP4 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:04:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (x-bolt-wan.smeinc.net [209.135.219.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776961ACCDC for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:04:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [209.135.209.5]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645549A401D; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:04:31 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([209.135.209.4]) by localhost (ronin.smeinc.net [209.135.209.5]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vF-Sz3kDMJTL; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:04:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [5.5.33.157] (vpn.snozzages.com [204.42.252.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5C39A4010; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:04:09 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <54C6717F.8010009@meetinghouse.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:03:56 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F1800F1F-0FDD-4A96-85EE-25B7F181F370@vigilsec.com>
References: <1F30A463-76A9-4854-952A-35C54E42D2C6@istaff.org> <CAOW+2dvd1QRC6xbDTZ6ah23HfX=K=SeXDc1kXr2NREAcy37SvQ@mail.gmail.com> <54C13630.3050601@meetinghouse.net> <54C3D305.6030705@acm.org> <20150125201843.GB76865@mx1.yitter.info> <c258dfbdcb3b45f3a5d239fc6c3f0246@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20150126024813.GB77105@mx1.yitter.info> <54C5ABCB.20000@meetinghouse.net> <20150126030945.GD77105@mx1.yitter.info> <54C5B476.6030900@meetinghouse.net> <20150126034153.GE77105@mx1.yitter.info> <CAOW+2duqxEebN0q8u2075SftYEXcaGfAHKYXZNZgwOTQaFxgTA@mail.gmail.com> <E23447D169EE488C80B2EDADF16E37F7@Timea> <54C6717F.8010009@meetinghouse.net>
To: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/WTEdlrNpDPuT5Y9WsDEMnerIgfs>
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal development process
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:04:43 -0000

>> SNIP
>> 
>>> [BA]  The IAOC has its own processes, which provide for community comment.
>> 
>> Can you point us to those processes?
> 
> Likewise.  And I'll note that I asked this precise question, multiple times, during preparation of the WG response, and got no substantive answer in response.

Please see https://iaoc.ietf.org/policy-procedures.html

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email