Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal development process
Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> Thu, 22 January 2015 17:25 UTC
Return-Path: <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A03751ACD2D for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:25:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CN8oQhfZIdoD for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:25:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com (mail-we0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B8341ACDB1 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:23:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id u56so3101012wes.0 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:23:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=+fuBAeFPq6UUed5SIO0qx/f7iLCLWJk5Inbce2jD4eo=; b=iFWwtvR60ETxzVtf5doTOI7Mtsd/IZ53uSfqEx609Sbw5aMR6eIHGD0exwCp9iaNs2 Gw4IOqKLTPN+xwgZ5Bdvf+rVZIEg9ahIPa++khnt+hwqdOhCJ2/hNekjg92MQh4Yl3LG HkAmDiVpZGxRx4gGdbcl3mNgxK/UUhNAE6q2fkTI913KcfwY3rmr8gw42NLRDJMp+Ke4 yIlw+8zGMcsHyok29M1N4jE7aLUxKivyTsLXTX1aSGBPOIejYj5ZahenDgeUX5kNRQ9x +JHjmNPPm/piaoEbAprYUmWMCrdfWrB7ktJwc6MzJKHvYbaNx6QfWsVhfTckgyIyYPei +xgw==
X-Received: by 10.180.107.228 with SMTP id hf4mr7188195wib.47.1421947422556; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:23:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.27.91.8 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:23:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1F30A463-76A9-4854-952A-35C54E42D2C6@istaff.org>
References: <C172BBB7-9BA4-4BA7-848C-C7FE5B66CBF7@cooperw.in> <F8FC64C8-6FC7-4672-B18B-46DF993A653A@cooperw.in> <54C091D2.9050608@gmail.com> <1F30A463-76A9-4854-952A-35C54E42D2C6@istaff.org>
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:23:22 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOW+2dvd1QRC6xbDTZ6ah23HfX=K=SeXDc1kXr2NREAcy37SvQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8f3ba7eb02c849050d40ef1e"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/pAI_Xxqj3JrJP-ZRmulO9CHHePo>
Cc: "ianaplan@ietf.org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal development process
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 17:25:17 -0000
John Curran said: "That's an excellent question, but even if the stated answer were "yes" I'm not certain its reasonable to rely (or expect) each member of the ICG to review the discussion in this portion of the community in order to obtain a thorough understanding of the arguments contrary to Richard's assertions of process issues... " [BA] A summary of process from authoritative parties might be useful. But it would also be useful to point out that we are talking about process concerns relating to requirements for legal work that hasn't yet been completed by an organization (the IAOC) distinct from the IANAPLAN WG. Until the legal work has been done and there are proposed contractual arrangements to analyze, we are talking about process objections to requirements for arrangements that do not yet exist, within a WG that was not chartered to handle the legal work. On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:22 PM, John Curran <jcurran@istaff.org> wrote: > On Jan 21, 2015, at 7:59 PM, Brian E Carpenter < > brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: > > It would be very tedious to have to repeat on the icg forum all the > > explanations of how Richard's concern misunderstands the IETF rough > > consensus process and ignores this WG's conscious preference not > > to address hypothetical future legal issues when we already have IETF > > organs chartered to do so. Can we assume the ICG members can see these > > explanations without their being repeated? > > That's an excellent question, but even if the stated answer were "yes" > I'm not certain its reasonable to rely (or expect) each member of the > ICG to review the discussion in this portion of the community in order > to obtain a thorough understanding of the arguments contrary to Richard's > assertions of process issues... hence, my posting of a brief assessment > as I see it, and leads me also to believe that a statement from a more > authoritative party (e.g. the WG chairs, IESG, or the IAB) highlighting > the main arguments might be prudent. There's no doubt that preparation > of such would be tedious, and hence the effort required to do so should > be weighed against the IETF's view of the importance of the task at hand. > > /John > > Disclaimer: my views alone. > > _______________________________________________ > Ianaplan mailing list > Ianaplan@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan >
- [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF pro… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Seun Ojedeji
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Jefsey
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Milton L Mueller
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Seun Ojedeji
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… John Curran
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… John C Klensin
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Seun Ojedeji
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Dave Crocker
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Miles Fidelman
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Milton L Mueller
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Seun Ojedeji
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… John C Klensin
- [Ianaplan] You told us not to trust you anymore [… Jefsey
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… John Curran
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… John Curran
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Miles Fidelman
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Seun Ojedeji
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Avri Doria
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… John Curran
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Avri Doria
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Milton L Mueller
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Miles Fidelman
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Miles Fidelman
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Miles Fidelman
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Miles Fidelman
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Richard Hill
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Richard Hill
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Miles Fidelman
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Miles Fidelman
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Russ Housley
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Miles Fidelman
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Miles Fidelman
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Seun Ojedeji
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Miles Fidelman
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Richard Hill
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Richard Hill
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Richard Hill
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Avri Doria
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Jari Arkko
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… JFC Morfin
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Seun Ojedeji
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Richard Hill
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Richard Hill
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Jefsey
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF… JFC Morfin