Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal development process

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Mon, 26 January 2015 17:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0DE61ACD55 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:24:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.259
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.259 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hNaM50RFP6pQ for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:24:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 999DC1ACD3A for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:24:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (nat-07-mht.dyndns.com [216.146.45.246]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B92628A035 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:24:06 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:24:05 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: ianaplan@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150126172405.GD464@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <20150126024813.GB77105@mx1.yitter.info> <54C5ABCB.20000@meetinghouse.net> <20150126030945.GD77105@mx1.yitter.info> <54C5B476.6030900@meetinghouse.net> <20150126034153.GE77105@mx1.yitter.info> <CAOW+2duqxEebN0q8u2075SftYEXcaGfAHKYXZNZgwOTQaFxgTA@mail.gmail.com> <E23447D169EE488C80B2EDADF16E37F7@Timea> <54C6717F.8010009@meetinghouse.net> <F1800F1F-0FDD-4A96-85EE-25B7F181F370@vigilsec.com> <54C675B7.3020501@meetinghouse.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <54C675B7.3020501@meetinghouse.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/OMAB5NhP-I2y4UhAsjbgBAxAJVY>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal development process
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:24:27 -0000

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:13:27PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> meetings - and basically silent about any role of IAOC in formulating policy
> for the IETF

This is ridiculous.  The IAOC has no role in "formulating policy for
the IETF", as the documents Bernard suggested you read make perfectly
clear.  The IAOC is accountable to the IETF.  I don't see any reason
to take up the WG's time with the sort of complaint you're making if
you cannot even bother to attend to the plain English meaning of the
documents.

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com