Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal development process

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Mon, 26 January 2015 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786251A9039 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:34:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h8-GrYCbt71F for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:34:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9D141B29BB for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:34:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B679BEF4 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:34:08 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rFK0LeWF2DK4 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:34:07 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.73] (unknown [86.46.18.232]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 88FEDBEE8 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:34:07 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <54C6B2CF.9000508@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:34:07 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ianaplan@ietf.org
References: <GLEAIDJPBJDOLEICCGMNCEDADAAA.rhill@hill-a.ch>
In-Reply-To: <GLEAIDJPBJDOLEICCGMNCEDADAAA.rhill@hill-a.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/VNZPD9-sQxau9wwwTOTciYTUvPU>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal development process
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:34:13 -0000

On 26/01/15 19:38, Richard Hill wrote:
> Nothing, it is all clear. Decisions will be made by the IAOC and the IETF
> Trust, not by the global multi-stakeholder community.  That's not what the
> NTIA requested.
> 

IETF decisions are made by the IETF by definition. I'm sorry to say
it but my reading of your emails is that you appear to be attempting
to side-track discussion into any rathole that appears on your horizon
but I'm sure that can't be the case. Can you explain what productive
end you are pursuing as it is utterly unclear to me at this point?
Because I'm just not seeing anything that makes sense in your recent
messages to be honest.

Thanks,
S.