Re: [Ianaplan] Consensus call -- text reply for ICG proposal review

Please note that I do not agree with this. I have many objections to the combined ICG proposal, even if not specifically with the protocols part of that proposal.

So I object to this.

Thanks and best,
Richard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ianaplan [mailto:ianaplan-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Leslie
> Daigle (ThinkingCat)
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 16:35
> To: Ianaplan@Ietf. Org
> Cc: Marc Blanchet
> Subject: [Ianaplan] Consensus call -- text reply for ICG proposal
> review
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> As noted in the minutes from today’s IANAPLAN WG virtual interim
> meeting, participants agreed on a brief message in support of the
> collected ICG proposal.
> 
> While the IAB is preparing a wider response, the proposal is that the
> IANAPLAN WG will communicate to the ICG the following message related
> to the IANAPLAN’s work output (part of the IETF contribution):
> 
> “The IETF IANAPLAN working group supports the draft ICG proposal going
> forward.  The IETF raised two transition points that are mentioned in
> Paragraph 3062 of the proposal.  We would ask that they be referenced
> in Part 0, Section V of the proposal as well.”
> 
> This message is to confirm WG consensus on the proposed action via this
> e-mail list.  All WG participants are encouraged to review the meeting
> minutes for further elaboration of the discussion around this text.  If
> you have any disagreement with it, please share your comment to this
> list by noon EDT (16h00 UTC) Friday August 28, 2015.
> 
> Thanks,
> Leslie, for Leslie&Marc.
> 
> --
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Leslie Daigle
> Principal, ThinkingCat Enterprises
> ldaigle@thinkingcat.com
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ianaplan mailing list
> Ianaplan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan