Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal development process

Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> Mon, 26 January 2015 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841161A1EF4 for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 08:58:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tqs02y4E20VE for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 08:58:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server1.neighborhoods.net (server1.neighborhoods.net [207.154.13.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B8D1A1EF2 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 08:58:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F66CC11B for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:58:34 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.6.2 (20081215) (Debian) at neighborhoods.net
Received: from server1.neighborhoods.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server1.neighborhoods.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id icrzklle4wRJ for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:58:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from new-host.home (pool-173-76-229-68.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [173.76.229.68]) by server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5DD5CCC17E for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:55:27 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <54C6717F.8010009@meetinghouse.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:55:27 -0500
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0 SeaMonkey/2.32
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ianaplan@ietf.org
References: <1F30A463-76A9-4854-952A-35C54E42D2C6@istaff.org> <CAOW+2dvd1QRC6xbDTZ6ah23HfX=K=SeXDc1kXr2NREAcy37SvQ@mail.gmail.com> <54C13630.3050601@meetinghouse.net> <54C3D305.6030705@acm.org> <20150125201843.GB76865@mx1.yitter.info> <c258dfbdcb3b45f3a5d239fc6c3f0246@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <20150126024813.GB77105@mx1.yitter.info> <54C5ABCB.20000@meetinghouse.net> <20150126030945.GD77105@mx1.yitter.info> <54C5B476.6030900@meetinghouse.net> <20150126034153.GE77105@mx1.yitter.info> <CAOW+2duqxEebN0q8u2075SftYEXcaGfAHKYXZNZgwOTQaFxgTA@mail.gmail.com> <E23447D169EE488C80B2EDADF16E37F7@Timea>
In-Reply-To: <E23447D169EE488C80B2EDADF16E37F7@Timea>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/qDtjSJ5LRBtXrnYGuyW2nfU6qdM>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal development process
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:58:36 -0000

Richard Hill wrote:
>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: Bernard Aboba
>> To: ianaplan@ietf.org
>> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 4:54 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] Process concern regarding the IETF proposal 
>> development process
>
> SNIP
>
>> [BA]  The IAOC has its own processes, which provide for community 
>> comment.
>
> Can you point us to those processes?
>
>

Likewise.  And I'll note that I asked this precise question, multiple 
times, during preparation of the WG response, and got no substantive 
answer in response.

Miles Fidelman





-- 
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra