Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-01.txt

Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> Wed, 12 October 2016 23:44 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F874129630 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U8sB4hCw5cad for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-f175.google.com (mail-qt0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBDF4120726 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-f175.google.com with SMTP id s49so28000924qta.0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=dNvHKKXxYdxHCWOS2YxF/cauhXEbXOzzzopJcg4qHsk=; b=vseB5Prus+skp7h/GHWmkLjWhjZOzvv1dsBN+ffRiZfK/2FYEePsqpfvkPMkFK7iZ1 d3lwlmjd1fN26StzzXzzNUZatbqwzExyA+9lw1KuhVnnJH82PDa4HKcEDLjsJpA5s4a6 O5Cx65YfHALyJ0UphO2Qs9fDPUjBu7raMlByUnwql6rxpCLppACeLWkX7XGaNAywbLxb YTORS/oYTfr2AfaUkzkKr+JRLMeYY08VZYhtcBrXwxNSdL+bo+HPox2Y2r54M+6wqquI /AvfMt3MZjFbYcolEhQxZCYH4fU8YdZepS0ORVVDY1MFynhK0JIwcAvDTrwLSJQcsiXg OMTA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dNvHKKXxYdxHCWOS2YxF/cauhXEbXOzzzopJcg4qHsk=; b=TFganVaaecrDSrljia9RAN83N1XNn0bj7whT+lfdlPxg15n375tQHAcH4iNCOdFA2W tfO5qAqrRAp1Srn5GQ93MknBPQ0z12kr+ETce91DGEkuHomf05SFsoyKEM3esRdelxs1 s/7a/0dkRt9QxPecvUxvEQQmlWrSKzE4efz40wpJPOafWlV2vbQlL2JdzbmRXzxV0agK 5sLeUFWqxP9vaMk0huq57Fbj8O7IeXdPu38JcKTpoC/pow4eAk4J0PmFRmElTfUD83DJ ISTmBT/3N5elV5dBX9kpt0elKf8EI7TxBbXcKfods6dcymojSfhCH3CpKpp8a99bt9m+ 0N0A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RmwpG3PHn958Tt720250OUP03aoD0wpthQZI8CAolplBTlKt/E0BRqxPB5zneH6A1jqpgrJQ2/zrGEzpA==
X-Received: by 10.237.58.161 with SMTP id o30mr3956297qte.3.1476315830939; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: christopher.morrow@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.105.244 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:43:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20161012233445.GY45879@shrubbery.net>
References: <020b01d223a1$f0e34a20$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <57FCC876.5090109@foobar.org> <52AF3F60-BC0F-44AC-89D7-8E108617162F@pfrc.org> <552160CC-1000-42B1-95E3-6F6B9E1DC2F8@gmail.com> <20161011221544.GG12806@shrubbery.net> <20161012134552.GE22695@pfrc.org> <20161012215623.GH45879@shrubbery.net> <CA+b+ER=d3DAObhJws3k2Jvmu6XJcpv8jJAkmROqb_zCXi430aQ@mail.gmail.com> <20161012223454.GR45879@shrubbery.net> <CA+b+ERnWScsYNkn2h59kFqVsAyZLywCFfR2KCOfRokM6nK0cNw@mail.gmail.com> <20161012233445.GY45879@shrubbery.net>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 19:43:49 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: GuglG2_b38fdrhMHgdUY32xE1DA
Message-ID: <CAL9jLab69ShyaSXEyb5FOOd7hGntDG3z2OcpPbx2qzDMpcUuHg@mail.gmail.com>
To: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11404abeae068a053eb3905b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/2macouhbQOObJXElzbFUzPK_3_k>
Cc: idr <idr@ietf.org>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-01.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 23:44:54 -0000

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:34 PM, heasley <heas@shrubbery.net> wrote:

> > ​If you need large community for IXes then it is fine. To me real use of
> > BGP as protocol is a bit more then that.
>
> I'm suggesting that there is a need there, a clear one with great benefit
> to them (ie: incentive), and RSes have more flexibility to alter their
> code and upgrade than others.


I think once -large- is in code from vendors it's easy to see rollout
happen where that sort of function is required... quickly. People will pick
up the code for their gear as they need this feature.