Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery

Nikos Triantafillis <ntriantafillis@gmail.com> Wed, 11 July 2018 21:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ntriantafillis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E66C130E73; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:24:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WKacz4caTW-z; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x235.google.com (mail-lf0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C347D130DDD; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x235.google.com with SMTP id u202-v6so22426875lff.9; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CHt7cDnu1CD+T+oi6nP5wPtMQdzwoXPXkgXItzxhltU=; b=gAX2x5OHe6GSL5jo3k4qP3nIBGEJcuqDKjXN41kzb25F1L7FRhOt8IiMrXgLY52+Le WJU/wAT+NHvltbjMOj69aiI0gT3EnN0oFoaIYwlj/Uf7c+g3hxtaLCwmt825RPhFiuHA GQP1rJ2w5/f6ZZpqT6cyX0vkD+r/Lq6p/yP4CZ0VwHwrSIqPiKcFAmB6hnK8tpZitOkF VfyiMEe2bCeWyiph7JC/rN5C9oKi1FpSiE9PkyFuKPW8ST6d5uJG6ZjUCD8sYtf2J59K t1J9UKcWc/Px9KRU+nPXLtZ9R8F8e18AV/iN3s8MXrt0580+0armZNxa8S232yzwKftq TJYg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CHt7cDnu1CD+T+oi6nP5wPtMQdzwoXPXkgXItzxhltU=; b=GwnpHsCodnkNxkNKD7tAYmMNVXY+4KcWDKHAkpFyuoylO2B3nrn4heJOGUQ+T90/0S bDAnPUY/PQTDt3u7dhhany5VYMrFbH+730qDCr48F+kdzTNnR68MUl0DAWLrm7qXYm5N LRuj4JymdJktQuWfUDNHbbwKFlHR06ZRn7DYLksRhIkKRjyo1OnquWI4irMzU8yV8kdr ym/Eu6cdEgCPuOfLa26+SZqCCNMrYy4OmMF1odGJUSTtNeCUqfYMKIYjbpvnEqxhsZeZ 0qXeednIkgaYurxGAzWVLtrQsEcM2xj6ZZcTyD2nBVhBnZUVWk3nd2eezzr2fpuN2fRb W3QA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlGrt9e+riZm+aTHQd8oXSjopbrJThS8WQXzeDDwUa/5wsxfyu/m L4c+mJvd0hvJSemtfDWSW5/H6EWGeOVFs3n4PWc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpe2wzByLHUrEQpoABBuR9TijhfOtzzW7jx72I4jhG/8kq2A514iKhqQ1w9WJZc/3xHXQ0tNwSuVqskoDp4GaiU=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:c954:: with SMTP id z81-v6mr154971lff.107.1531344257813; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a19:8003:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E0D48054-CE8E-44AE-AD22-D95F56CAF603@gmail.com>
References: <013701d41227$579d2d10$06d78730$@ndzh.com> <E0D48054-CE8E-44AE-AD22-D95F56CAF603@gmail.com>
From: Nikos Triantafillis <ntriantafillis@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:24:17 +0300
Message-ID: <CA+R4MGew1Euv17CP=ZWbnaROHMiU9QrBOG=TPAVTPi17x0Q4fw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008412a50570bfde47"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/B2jEjOOUMw4wgXWQ1bhiRmsPYNI>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 21:24:23 -0000

Support.

Nikos.-

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 8:39 PM, Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Sue,
>
> Support.
>
> 1) Yes
> 2) Yes, BGP is most commonly used in most DCs. However, it may have
> applications beyond that.
> 3) yes, in order to simplify operations for DCs. Single CP is needed.
> 4) it should be reviewed by LSVR WG.
>
> Gaurav
>
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
>
>> Greetings:
>>
>>
>>
>> This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery
>> (July 2 – July 16).
>>
>>
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery/
>>
>>
>>
>> The authors of this draft should send their IPR statements in response to
>> this email.  I hope the authors will ihelp their vacationing co-authors to
>> respond by July 7th.
>>
>>
>>
>> The WG should consider the following:
>>
>> 1)      Does BGP need to have an autodiscovery mechanism for peers
>> within Data Centers?
>>
>> 2)      Does this mechanism work for other deployments?
>>
>>
>>
>> 3)      If so, should be passed in BGP Hello message?
>>
>> Or should it be a part of another protocol (e.g. LLDP, BFD, etc).
>>
>>
>>
>> 4)      Does this interact with any of the LSVR work?
>>
>>
>>
>> I want to thank the authors for their patience while we sorted through
>> some of the WG LC for other drafts.  We decided to wait until some of those
>> discussion were cleared up prior to starting a new WG Adoption call.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Susan Hares
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Idr mailing list
>> Idr@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
>