IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery

Gunter Van De Velde <guntervandeveldecc@icloud.com> Thu, 12 July 2018 07:23 UTC

Return-Path: <guntervandeveldecc@icloud.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3088613107B; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=icloud.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Si31eKQ-EgP; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from st13p11im-asmtp003.me.com (st13p11im-asmtp003.me.com [17.164.40.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C733B131090; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from process-dkim-sign-daemon.st13p11im-asmtp003.me.com by st13p11im-asmtp003.me.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.1.2.20170607 64bit (built Jun 7 2017)) id <0PBQ00H00SAWDA00@st13p11im-asmtp003.me.com>; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 07:23:36 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=icloud.com; s=04042017; t=1531380216; bh=7LrvyW9/q60GYT6NL1WFfQ1O/GDFVaGuIhCKHi+gT9Q=; h=From:Message-id:Content-type:MIME-version:Subject:Date:To; b=Nd7Z6+OljOHCACenlwntXRp2vtBwFD6kcBENN932JCbqtjQHpy2M9bjZpkobAYTch qsb7A6OkeGetyTwff5DvyJKQC6Zry8WDHfNzL+EeZIenVss3V44r3Xo/CvnjiRXiQg vJV2uPOM7IRHxkBUaY+1WEjdjlETat/MC6+BqE9kJjNpzE0LnrgpWDbV4lv4lF44zb P8PwQCkO03o60WEQd4P4qQd559QHxjl5Qkghn0r+tOkg5LpLo9z0JoCpXyjkzb/4AN 7ySNc2ohu3AKKetipREwvXPWJOnChKzPl0GgLCqQgN8JphohCPD4DkYnl3ehCt6Xu2 8JedCqtkHadyw==
Received: from icloud.com ([127.0.0.1]) by st13p11im-asmtp003.me.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.1.2.20170607 64bit (built Jun 7 2017)) with ESMTPSA id <0PBQ00N4WSJ82V20@st13p11im-asmtp003.me.com>; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 07:23:35 +0000 (GMT)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2018-07-12_03:,, signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 suspectscore=3 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1807120076
From: Gunter Van De Velde <guntervandeveldecc@icloud.com>
Message-id: <7220CFF5-1AF7-4644-B078-E545BDF2E346@icloud.com>
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0520A9EB-868B-4245-B2B4-A64CBEEF1949"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.4 \(3445.8.2\))
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 09:23:31 +0200
In-reply-to: <E0D48054-CE8E-44AE-AD22-D95F56CAF603@gmail.com>
Cc: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery@ietf.org, lsvr-chairs@ietf.org
To: Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <013701d41227$579d2d10$06d78730$@ndzh.com> <E0D48054-CE8E-44AE-AD22-D95F56CAF603@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.8.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/GpQ3vhuw6MudR9A3aJnrdBpgSFc>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 07:23:56 -0000

LSVR realises that there is need for a neighbour and liveliness detection mechanism, and is making effort to understand the particular LSVR requirements for a solution. 

From a very high level perspective, there are few ways to address the aspect of LSVR peer discovery and liveliness detection:
1) Create something new
2) Extend something existing
3) Re-use something existing

LSVR has no technology religion about any of these, and would like to progress with a solution space that most 
optimal answers the particular LSVR requirements. 

Within LSVR WG meeting at IETF102, there is time reserved to discuss about these matters, and if you feel interested, we could add this draft into the agenda?

Brgds,
G/





> On 11 Jul 2018, at 19:39, Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Sue,
> 
> Support.
> 
> 1) Yes
> 2) Yes, BGP is most commonly used in most DCs. However, it may have applications beyond that.
> 3) yes, in order to simplify operations for DCs. Single CP is needed.
> 4) it should be reviewed by LSVR WG.
> 
> Gaurav
> 
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com <mailto:shares@ndzh.com>> wrote:
> Greetings:
> 
>  
> 
> This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery (July 2 – July 16). 
> 
>  
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery/>
>  
> 
> The authors of this draft should send their IPR statements in response to this email.  I hope the authors will ihelp their vacationing co-authors to respond by July 7th. 
> 
>  
> 
> The WG should consider the following:
> 
> 1)      Does BGP need to have an autodiscovery mechanism for peers within Data Centers?
> 
> 2)      Does this mechanism work for other deployments?
> 
>  
> 
> 3)      If so, should be passed in BGP Hello message? 
> 
> Or should it be a part of another protocol (e.g. LLDP, BFD, etc).
> 
>  
> 
> 4)      Does this interact with any of the LSVR work?
> 
>  
> 
> I want to thank the authors for their patience while we sorted through some of the WG LC for other drafts.  We decided to wait until some of those discussion were cleared up prior to starting a new WG Adoption call.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Susan Hares
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org <mailto:Idr@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email