IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 12 July 2018 22:09 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79F11311D3; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 15:09:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WUOzHpCS-GPU; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 15:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x232.google.com (mail-pf0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C1FB1311BD; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 15:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id x10-v6so11516322pfm.4; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 15:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=qKAAWbettfZAOV4DhNK/JoLgAtvydCbXJPZniZioz8Q=; b=ON32ALSN0vrflDOiqpo7F5yTUWBT+9iWP1Y3TZipWJiVPTawVViziiP74q6yiD1G+l 8dpzQGMFRxVsoHRq1nmxs0zexKJDIM5/lDsovO5pwhxqa2e1zHKXk+dyuCvQK4QPtZeP QFXiJ7tatjWtiQXN3DmzIMWuCiAN1b3o2jAQ2dJpYsloYkY211y2KcHjeqDprXjaJ9Xo SfhxI2L2CrsOCLGF7bI6DkWq831fu4BwHjuikn3NfS8kV8WhqFg2tEodVRgiwP+BhV3p oQtDCFBugqwTNBZCVYctMwcRquvd7l/2iyAoSBGOKMCXyyvJAo6rsDNCoUbjrx9+komg vhuw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qKAAWbettfZAOV4DhNK/JoLgAtvydCbXJPZniZioz8Q=; b=Y0OjIZ35q2aS8cBjKGiFhsvFxrzsNfkW0i3T4NKfCMAx+ZGdoAQ+dxh3uSLoU06Kfu z5JrGqNF2RXr7k32fKOyjvncaQFQ9bq9lAkJjOy6iFxJttPBpbiLpj+k26u4003WdAgE 1fiLOib3KmpEIH1QpjzZFtajjVTOmW+ffx8KAmh2gvrZVZaiy9RMDCpj/Ob8ElZXvGGn tUqdisd5TbKRqRYAG2j5t1bvcNhFr1VMnY28YrZZcMy17iSNgj6jzeqr0NQl53398Gvu mlOEmQ19SP3ZlTcCc066HAImrdABIuk7pcB9B5Dj0f+E1+bfkp5lFaCflHFz1K5GKHoF D6yg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlGrAFBgY6MHoh1wDEmtdLhoQ9EkA5Y36ER9pFuP4cyhYwyJKz5a eNfAbJ2gOgJ4x50HcMWcTx1IszcPehZTXjV0D7q+6A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpeUIhKG+1oiaRIj9LyXGbsZU13gtpYObm2R7QglM6qdnJKdPpoq4kWEiviCweT5BiBByajtsA35TrkD3RhUX8U=
X-Received: by 2002:a65:5c83:: with SMTP id a3-v6mr3670078pgt.164.1531433396949; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 15:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 2002:a17:90a:9c3:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 15:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+wi2hOFDbB2kKS2ptd0S2HVH2UbL7vX6kPNCfhcfkUtedTO4g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <013701d41227$579d2d10$06d78730$@ndzh.com> <d0ae2da8-e932-84f2-f634-3e0f280a6fb5@juniper.net> <20180712200303.GU12853@pfrc.org> <CA+b+ER=VhiUJxgZ2TXmSTCAHHWg7sdOrRo=OWWGjY76PMW=Gaw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+wi2hOFDbB2kKS2ptd0S2HVH2UbL7vX6kPNCfhcfkUtedTO4g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:09:56 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: DUD5VHJLUJkkv59W_Onb27PRrbc
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERkZV+sn_ptqHUbQVMtsVp-jmKm7cANW4X8mavdcG83=QQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery <draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery@ietf.org>, Sue Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009f5b490570d49f26"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/mYELIAv1dTAAoBfO7Thw2wu7YEU>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 22:09:59 -0000

Hey Tony,

Honestly and in the public I do want to state that if given a choice of
keep "enhancing" real BGP focusing on DCs vs running RIFT the latter wins
without any doubt.

As long as RIFT is solid and available to run on most of the OEM vendors
and is supported in any common white box operating systems other then code
maturity I would not see any issues to run it for most DCs that really need
such optimal dynamic routing.

Thx,
R.



On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 12:00 AM, Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
>> and for those really brave:
>>
>> * run RIFT
>>
>>
> You probably meant to say "for those who actually want to be able to run
> something that exists". For people interested in code I can encourage
> hackathon102 participation. We're aiming to got a first interop hello 3-way
> up and probably ZTP :-P
>
> Gee, that used to be all "rough consensus and running code". One got
> definitiely more contentious and the other gets harder and harder to find
> these days ...
>
> Otherwise, on the issue, unsurprisingly, I fully concur with Eric,
> especially it maybe quite enlightening to go through a small exercise of
> trying to extend the BGP neighbor FSM with the suggested change  ...
>
> thanks
>
> --- tony
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email