Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery

["Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <[e-mail]>]

Hello,

I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft.

Thanks,
Ketan

From: Susan Hares <[e-mail]>
Sent: 02 July 2018 22:39
To: [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]; 'ÐìС»¢(ÒåÏÈ)' <[e-mail]>; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; 'John Scudder' <[e-mail]>
Subject: WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery

Greetings:

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery (July 2 ¨C July 16).

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery/

The authors of this draft should send their IPR statements in response to this email.  I hope the authors will ihelp their vacationing co-authors to respond by July 7th.

The WG should consider the following:

1)     Does BGP need to have an autodiscovery mechanism for peers within Data Centers?

2)     Does this mechanism work for other deployments?



3)     If so, should be passed in BGP Hello message?

Or should it be a part of another protocol (e.g. LLDP, BFD, etc).


4)     Does this interact with any of the LSVR work?

I want to thank the authors for their patience while we sorted through some of the WG LC for other drafts.  We decided to wait until some of those discussion were cleared up prior to starting a new WG Adoption call.


Susan Hares