IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] 回复： 回复： WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Tue, 17 July 2018 15:35 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542C9130DC0; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 08:35:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VfQkcZR1DCeE; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 08:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x529.google.com (mail-pg1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::529]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAD3E130E30; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 08:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x529.google.com with SMTP id r1-v6so597039pgp.11; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 08:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=xB6un6d9OqaKeGpEjKQ86yl8bWDz7hbngdPO9IAHR3E=; b=ddTIOmCn7doBwsUXu3l15SQen83q7V/q1DiD1s49UWh+LpVHm/EpkfMSgqD5ZiUj74 cf51eoKgjiUo99lNV+xJuvSIi0/SzZ+2xCwT13XRuwn75P4tliNNc4sTMeI9cPjqDHas Qgy9gYrA1cKIVq0HqdY4rtm/rMewI0vIgfMMHE3qsVQtA138C5HPKUsQ8HsrWia00GX1 WYqeVG3e3AOcQE03Adv+Dmx1fC5uk06r5DHSdB4YrmbwppDb4biNbBslhCxJZKnTSy/B T0xWc4HSTqNC6pcQcPO2veTDi5mAzwBDKj79JeG70gTvj/Hde1EsSWx4tkLT8RNMesMu BM4A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xB6un6d9OqaKeGpEjKQ86yl8bWDz7hbngdPO9IAHR3E=; b=o9VvNA7/i7oqDbsO/4tSD8GqWl6BWl7nZoEmypEUpTWgrm8gDAGDiA3G3gwX8lIAl+ E10d1eonHVMUTKp3HhwI5Rqk7TF0CqvFMEOoPaSGSDU2l55Iqkt5NnXY0FgU28+HN6tM S7kfx6H9g+Tysw0DVfwIOSJvgZmg0+P7pNI7gF7mpwmpoPe7gl0HowwJnaaGID0YEuwU 7V4IzbTbIHnR+mnjDHvp3ukO7NaPzmlj8c2P0ynaSj1hUUxeusU9e/P7g9mzrn0YLHiZ Je13VXE7Da7wAhrotsZrQYAo8/6TrB4GcX27XqpMF87BDnSo2PxsfxaLF69yylWarPz8 mCCA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlF/4zq0Tpop+60wz25sYkvQ+ACTpiNMX49MwmopePvI8J0dPFZ2 hDAVBsBwjmwDRqU7nU/dLk3jabgoYSgqsPrpKQ8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfwql/4v33q6CRzcjEMrUkXIxdTTTcxqPx+QkbRdmwkbvvJizMLR8o1XRWcY/jfT0v/SCMQWYozSGZIxwT9MKI=
X-Received: by 2002:a65:5641:: with SMTP id m1-v6mr2119324pgs.246.1531841718214; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 08:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 2002:a17:90a:d396:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 08:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4d995b1c-ee92-46e2-a8e8-c5adc412e717.xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
References: <013701d41227$579d2d10$06d78730$@ndzh.com> <6ACB426F-D10D-43E2-BC12-2D41D0CCE88A@arrcus.com> <CA+R4MGeh=+e4FvPfeGzd-4UnxuPiwHHEMEKuieXZOTitVYHm2A@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERmAHwKY8x0jH6Pk9Svu1BQFDxrG2ozQO97VHWV=jXtHqA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+R4MGcoer=tAVCPPYTsXp-DtiO1cxArxJA=iAMsJ_A_LmzrhA@mail.gmail.com> <20401d8c-4591-0507-776f-a154bc968245@juniper.net> <006401d41d30$b3e0b1f0$1ba215d0$@ndzh.com> <009a01d41d31$d4c96b40$7e5c41c0$@ndzh.com> <b6d6905f2b904a21bfb8e59d8e760199@XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com> <B17A6910EEDD1F45980687268941550F36779D63@MISOUT7MSGUSRCD.ITServices.sbc.com> <66faeea6-b4c4-4ef6-84a7-3bdc4737a6eb.xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com> <4d995b1c-ee92-46e2-a8e8-c5adc412e717.xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 17:35:17 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ha-pbWMTYxAww3wGcYWoKH0CaLo
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERmoCA7XMWuh35Mx4GDC-sKAbtPrSz+1WyQ4DJFbsGqGFw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "徐小虎(义先)" <xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
Cc: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org>, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, Eric C Rosen <erosen@juniper.net>, Nikos Triantafillis <ntriantafillis@gmail.com>, Keyur Patel <keyur@arrcus.com>, "draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery@ietf.org" <draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery@ietf.org>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007765f8057133b134"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/WtrP5MbJtlWEcXCitMWq7Y5vn-4>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 回复： 回复： WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 15:35:22 -0000

>
> By the way, in addition to automate and simplify the use of BGP as IGP in
> MSDC, the BGP peer auto-discovery mechanism as described in this draft has
> the potential to be applicable to BGP-SR-TE and LSVR as well.
>
> Sorry for touching the LSVR cheese unintentionally:)
>


​And that is precisely the fundamental issue not a feature to be proud
about here. You do not turn BGP into link state protocol because you like
to apply LSVR or BGP-SR-TE in the DCs.

Its completely upside down.

That's why my draft ​
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raszuk-idr-bgp-auto-session-setup-00 is a
simple and short honesty check. Is this discussion about helping to bring
the BGP sessions up in some env. or it is rather a black box which bringing
BGP discovery is just a label on it and content will explode in no time
when its shipped ?

Thx,
R.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email