IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery

Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 11 July 2018 17:39 UTC

Return-Path: <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E909130E63; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XCmWUAVYDNDL; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl0-x231.google.com (mail-pl0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B443130E64; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl0-x231.google.com with SMTP id 6-v6so9467825plb.0; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:cc:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ZtsCsu8+/XCJbn8fS8DxaET0jIQfWK70nBHjxvDLW+g=; b=OdqJhsFZbpGw+AGyS9aFZIwdwZEfincxNc1QOcvqrBptEP7qgCFaTT2nBfpH/CDJ/H gLpnhMdt8KMt8GLkXmK90+JmvqE91ZaM5r5+soJHNuGB6CvcvbXyA4qOzQ8fHJ1Xmjt/ Xqe3pDjKjtthC+Za4LO7+js3aYK5n3w+o8rZwrBDsolyiaT09N+vAkQ1IS/OZ1yNAyeP cYvHzS8L4w6OScJFtyKyLX5Oo77WUFmY8fuwEPOn7nK9CZZi8w4f5GpjPtcpfVOqS3XU /ZqKWUx3DAt3pfm2en/NyDYs/MfYti9evBa3sLIG8JaBK4xQHP+ziHNK4bNuuxwZE7qE T1Dg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:cc:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ZtsCsu8+/XCJbn8fS8DxaET0jIQfWK70nBHjxvDLW+g=; b=UqeA/OQgUTPfpXEslM46MotXWRGy0IjpL/ZDtGEbw7aAIBqxgT4Vm3ErycJDBWArcu c3soKBBG+DoVPWlxxCPySKO+K0+dosYq0ykN0lLUEho7cHf6xY4Wo41UaEyQP4Th7/5K OlfGqwaqRam3pqql/wwCryDUAvb6X8s166mAscDUHoA31hvocH2VVDaTkGFSn9p4+Ue/ LV+Z+bJxYvbiOiyhu7gobJS2cK1w1jS+w2dKCYoIfGqTsD4S6R678gO9NRfCteEDinEh HLq/hj917yazRCBWmEGf8yEAiwweKT3pZ8pEkvj/t3A2NpNsPzTPmks5w+ZYdvYPsDAp sT6Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlHmRjWZt7ids7fJvLfJZNY95EnK2ABUT9NPWfDDU3YOIIwz2MC2 1Y6JsOn8O9LN/B8EhXjeqzA8eHfk
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpeQiGLzr6HG19jRbZCGiXDyWuCOJAwF68nSkOZ/3BG0d31Vuh7BLxq19UZH+ge84iVjsws2Sw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a40b:: with SMTP id p11-v6mr5078115plq.228.1531330768775; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:39:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.23.116.36] ([216.52.21.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i6-v6sm30739973pfo.107.2018.07.11.10.39.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-221808EC-E9E7-4F10-9FB8-23EFA8EBBDC1"
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15F79)
In-Reply-To: <013701d41227$579d2d10$06d78730$@ndzh.com>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:39:26 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received: by 2002:ab3:d68:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 19:04:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <E0D48054-CE8E-44AE-AD22-D95F56CAF603@gmail.com>
References: <013701d41227$579d2d10$06d78730$@ndzh.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/zg5aWvC5j_SEhiNDfzMkFWOiHec>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 17:39:33 -0000

Hi Sue,

Support.

1) Yes
2) Yes, BGP is most commonly used in most DCs. However, it may have applications beyond that.
3) yes, in order to simplify operations for DCs. Single CP is needed.
4) it should be reviewed by LSVR WG.

Gaurav

> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
> Greetings:
> 
>  
> 
> This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery (July 2 – July 16). 
> 
>  
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xu-idr-neighbor-autodiscovery/
> 
>  
> 
> The authors of this draft should send their IPR statements in response to this email.  I hope the authors will ihelp their vacationing co-authors to respond by July 7th. 
> 
>  
> 
> The WG should consider the following:
> 
> 1)      Does BGP need to have an autodiscovery mechanism for peers within Data Centers?
> 
> 2)      Does this mechanism work for other deployments?
> 
>  
> 
> 3)      If so, should be passed in BGP Hello message? 
> 
> Or should it be a part of another protocol (e.g. LLDP, BFD, etc).
> 
>  
> 
> 4)      Does this interact with any of the LSVR work?
> 
>  
> 
> I want to thank the authors for their patience while we sorted through some of the WG LC for other drafts.  We decided to wait until some of those discussion were cleared up prior to starting a new WG Adoption call.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Susan Hares
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email