Re: [Idr] [GROW] draft-snijders-idr-shutdown-00: Drop a line in the peer's syslog at shutdown

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Thu, 17 November 2016 01:44 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64BA6129516; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:44:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2Lif797LnrGn; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:44:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82FB41294DC; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:44:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B7AD01E369; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 20:47:01 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 20:47:01 -0500
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
Message-ID: <20161117014701.GE6217@pfrc.org>
References: <20161116061556.GG1073@dhcp-9341.meeting.ietf.org> <20161117013640.GB6217@pfrc.org> <20161117014215.GI22270@dhcp-9341.meeting.ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161117014215.GI22270@dhcp-9341.meeting.ietf.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/amWioLkfy5J6JjYlwxtkuR_a5IE>
Cc: idr@ietf.org, grow@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] [GROW] draft-snijders-idr-shutdown-00: Drop a line in the peer's syslog at shutdown
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:44:06 -0000

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:42:15AM +0900, Job Snijders wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 08:36:40PM -0500, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:15:56PM +0900, Job Snijders wrote:
> > > Some might wonder, why "Cease"?
> > > 
> > > The beauty of using a new Cease subcode, is that the NOTIFICATION
> > > message type already allows extra data to be attached, so for most
> > > implementations it will be very simple to bolt what is specified in
> > > draft-snijders-idr-shutdown-00 on top of their existing code. In some
> > > cases we are looking at just a handful of lines.
> > 
> > As I commented elsewhere, changing subcodes ends up being painful from a
> > conformance standpoint.  I would honestly not recommend a new subcode.
> 
> I don't follow, it seems you recommend to not change the behaviour of an
> existing subcode (conformance), but you also recommend against getting a
> new subcode?  Can you clarify?

No new subcodes.
Add the text to the NOTIFICATION Data section of existing subcodes, when it
makes sense and that Data section isn't otherwise specified.

-- Jeff