[Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-large-community-03.txt (10/17/2016 to 10/31/2016)

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Mon, 17 October 2016 20:29 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E35712998B for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:29:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.946
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i5jaz-CzUz46 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A6521295A5 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 13:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=199.187.221.190;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: 'IETF IDR WG' <idr@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:27:31 -0400
Message-ID: <01f301d228b4$e3319ef0$a994dcd0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01F4_01D22893.5C226FF0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdIotF10Qx6LizvwQ9uItB9ryESdDg==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/aob_oBb35EQRW0s_Rit17eQvqTQ>
Subject: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-large-community-03.txt (10/17/2016 to 10/31/2016)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 20:29:13 -0000

This begins a 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-large-community-03.txt.  (10/17
to 10/31).   Please comment if draft-ietf-idr-large-community-03.txt  is
ready for publication.   

 

If you have concerns with the text,  please be very specific about what is
wrong and what needs to change.  If you have concerns about operational
aspects, please give a complete description of the problem and why this
draft does not solve it. 

 

This WG LC is not a place to debate whether we should have adopted this
technology.  

 

The focus of WG LC is whether this technology has implementations (see IDR
wiki for examples),  and whether these implementation inter-operate.  It is
also important to consider deployment issue or problems on currently.  

 

Sue Hares and John Scudder