IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-large-community-03.txt (10/17/2016 to 10/31/2016)

Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> Fri, 21 October 2016 12:59 UTC

Return-Path: <jared@puck.nether.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D6D1295F0 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 05:59:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MLIw5iPB2OgK for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 05:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [IPv6:2001:418:3f4::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C891295DD for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 05:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.233.195.11] (c-69-136-137-59.hsd1.mi.comcast.net [69.136.137.59]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by puck.nether.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8730B540CD0; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 08:59:32 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14A456)
In-Reply-To: <CAF3K5KvWM+NYqDQeaO89YrV5giptj+S4VheukdjOQXMLWg7Vxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 08:59:31 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <257C497A-BE91-47AD-85DE-9E5B3E64795B@puck.nether.net>
References: <01f301d228b4$e3319ef0$a994dcd0$@ndzh.com> <20161017215134.GA464@pfrc.org> <20161018190851.GC15392@shrubbery.net> <20161018191521.GT95811@Vurt.local> <9EFC9BAA-F917-4C70-A139-1F69CAECF9C0@pfrc.org> <20161020215938.GE1074@Vurt.local> <adb00bcd7b8e45db857eae7019c646fc@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com> <CAF3K5KvWM+NYqDQeaO89YrV5giptj+S4VheukdjOQXMLWg7Vxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Chappell <adam.chappell@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/dmKeMN_O1YwlPTAbIyT-tCustc8>
Cc: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>, IETF IDR WG <idr@ietf.org>, Sue Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-large-community-03.txt (10/17/2016 to 10/31/2016)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:59:35 -0000

I share others concerns here as well. I see no clarity from this change. 

Jared Mauch

> On Oct 21, 2016, at 8:36 AM, Adam Chappell <adam.chappell@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I must confess I find the original text slightly simpler, and I can't read obvious benefit from the replacement text, because:

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email