Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]

Paul Wouters <paul@cypherpunks.ca> Sun, 22 September 2013 16:59 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@cypherpunks.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E76321F949F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 09:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.465
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.465 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.134, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xhE3WnS2OHlh for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 09:59:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F4611E80FE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 09:59:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3cjZd64QF6z75l; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:59:06 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eCFfPO2zO1lQ; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:59:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:59:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 500) id 238838009E; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:59:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15BD380018; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:59:02 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:59:02 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@cypherpunks.ca>
X-X-Sender: paul@bofh.nohats.ca
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Subject: Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
In-Reply-To: <523E76BC.4040009@dcrocker.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1309221255450.17028@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <523BD51A.2080101@gmail.com> <C91E67751B1EFF41B857DE2FE1F68ABA153DB96C@tk5ex14mbxc272.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <523E76BC.4040009@dcrocker.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 16:59:19 -0000

On Sat, 21 Sep 2013, Dave Crocker wrote:

>> 2) Encourage distributed services over centralized services. For
>> example, social networking services today are heavily centralized.
>
> +1
>
> Except that essentially all services other than email have gained popularity 
> in centralized form, including IM.

Note that decentralising makes you less anonymous. If everyone runs
their own jabber service with TLS and OTR, you are less anonymous than
today. So "decentralising" is not a solution on its own for meta-data
tracking.

> So there appear to be some important and 
> difficult operational and usability barriers, standing in the way of more 
> truly distributed applications.

Because people still think of data centers are the CPUs running the
internet, when they should be thinking of loading up everyone's phones
with these services. These devices are more powerful that our 4U servers
of 10 years ago.

Paul