IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]

Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Mon, 23 September 2013 11:07 UTC

Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739CC21F9F03 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 04:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JY+ILX7tVzUM for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 04:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x234.google.com (mail-ie0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C09E21F9EF6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 04:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id u16so5843510iet.25 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 04:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=RQGEdCUYznS1UJ/HUz5omgQ3KwWE/P+jbOXmdVc6EjU=; b=RknhMUo/0tHW1gs6ZPv7V93IgXh5gYYcjEFYDSoFsnr1CTA/Kkg0B8yp4zAwvvEZoM DPzkjo5ApYpc+9ffQZQL1VOgVr3qraWPSW85MZa8tGh5f7EBADn+vzJQptTffzv1GLwm 5UfzLQaIuccZl7X2n28hi4f/pMfLDfr5JM3TIB4b9RDYMB5jfzStQ8elI5eQwWK7E60L V7m4SkKW/PuxGXGjCbMptdB7gts/vfs9YyvC+cyW3Ot817iCaHZW+JDoNtmY1IfxzM2H sbav/XRZeF9pwRZ/K8sl2ndtnASSBGPg5f+WCBVADNc3TX/rCUaDgUqBK0YHQw7XUocn IvsA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=RQGEdCUYznS1UJ/HUz5omgQ3KwWE/P+jbOXmdVc6EjU=; b=HUv65Ed6QvFKsup1ifliQKNJYgXuH1UgV44WOHn0EpCYn7hmye4R38KW2my7zY9lJZ gjVxAOSdMBFxZHYMW8TVPPI4+SVBnqISvDFWe7t/XZSvHO8zfAZN8+Oudkfp1+h/Vgsj Ms0oNYarfEWePMnyxe8T3D8b7kYK2oI0VFsojt4H0IcZr4ojpdiy3wFCxD41RCpPCGbE GB7mx5vP7+bL9tOjtzhf5lo5ExgoC4WjVGLkaEkJnc1LVFzZoCMR9x/b3lSVAw+ykdDr 5vv1hXhF7+IRGSU8dLq2K9vIXTehOld/AgInJTnGu+8u+5kHbZgF3LU3PgVsm8OGl+0w zRwg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnfl9YBrRmyPCUFWTelpA1VDQrvcuVAZbnXATQpYkUsESnQmaUrKXY4v04n93aht8LN73uUEQ37qRIfFt8IACiou9xJPL7+ofP6gtGhdI0R1hxhJTLJemq7Jf9ODxcSjQbGB1mVLMGONAihO0MgnVqOFPC3fqUR8XbMhng7WtjYloijWx9Qv4ZYdRJhVhSnR93pjfgk
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.43.130.2 with SMTP id hk2mr12284645icc.11.1379934469969; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 04:07:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.230.140 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 04:07:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130920214254.0b66ed90@resistor.net>
References: <523BD51A.2080101@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130920214254.0b66ed90@resistor.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:07:49 +0100
Message-ID: <CABrd9STC6deWSUjnz14sDjT4yf9JWkz4VeaasfX8--=0ThO5bA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00.txt]
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: IETF Discussion List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:07:51 -0000

On 21 September 2013 06:02, SM <sm@resistor.net> wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> At 21:54 19-09-2013, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>
>> I got my arm slightly twisted to produce the attached: a simple
>> concatenation of some of the actionable suggestions made in the
>> discussion of PRISM and Bruce Schneier's call for action.
>
>
> Thanks for writing the draft.  For the sake of disclosure [1], I know some
> of the XSF members.
>
> draft-carpenter-prismatic-reflections-00 mentions that:
>
>   "Clearly, we have a lot of specification work ongoing in different
>    areas that helps to mitigate various security vulnerabilities.
>    This ranges from recent work on XMPP end-to-end security ...."
>
> I recently read an article about XMPP (
> https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/05/google-abandons-open-standards-instant-messaging
> ).  From the article:
>
>   "removes the option to disable the archiving of all chat communications"

What it removes is default disabling. It is still possible to disable
all archiving, you just have to do it for each chat.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email