Re: Registration open for IETF 114

Mary B <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com> Thu, 12 May 2022 20:11 UTC

Return-Path: <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841E0C159820 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2022 13:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, GB_AFFORDABLE=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9eBwDb5NNLtr for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 May 2022 13:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19E7BC159493 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2022 13:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id t5so7510723edw.11 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 May 2022 13:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KsrK/0L/Q6ySHHhJFZTaaY9HcQI6n7odtYnpDgszr7k=; b=DppD5ExgulgyOisF8rY+wOdP6EE7fnU4APjCwRLsaKcykA7bf8uaKZ4lKZkDWXqfCl AVYDQ7VV8WI9MsJuAeKPjSAnPbGFHI4F6JtwKWzQLm8AgrroxhaO6H33X2yDtuD3kSa0 JzovKUsmgM7MLfj4lNFQ3cs10yDgyrRsURq+TtTE2EyXuvKYL9DG4XANgTHMbR4nE9JM 4sPNa3WZGNzzZgHSR1waL/Cssj8DO2f9DuVrAqpT+N8yv5RTEITM0b82mxMTwqInaKjq ghayjbrcIPP5Z2iaB3+pol4z2NUI+jGP7OmbH6dYDUCugMKyiBzZg0XbekAKwQURqTqH GHSQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KsrK/0L/Q6ySHHhJFZTaaY9HcQI6n7odtYnpDgszr7k=; b=EJy5ooMSJZ2q/KbvBYxDq4PCn7lMbpVXZHuH0IOEoz38CS+fOqaGIz0sDJlFN8EjdH xsvSklV+HKiHmm0TQSeGBDG7pTct9v4/I8FRbMKQ+pj6LR6lVHahRMKj1FHCFlKbBzU6 FvMgdv/pA76zXVwjAufIBJ1HrwIL0IBdTMEYerZqmxUDBD5H2LvylCeCxzuu3zYHbEuG /cfeG2tRVTr8dVQ9GOYoezck6rv947DIuVzWXX6NYUn+EelY1YvAOgYhZ+I/lBVKX4Wh 0nn+fz4qJtczwCPAbOFI81rCzvH+9ZakeEO7ubQ29TaHhX1e51ym7gZzlQw88w4mH2TZ WgQQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5333TMt56wsEJgrm8cBttczex3YRof9bnwZrAkhs0kf2kIalA7/d 9raIebBZ93wjH4XgMRnTUX75zdkFAZA0qx8oaukpoVrcTkE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyZbRxHhMuVjug8J8t0Y6UMS8nkp7Xryb06o6b9D0vptCaSrF/ICSrAm2JUnSQYYOc92IAnnw8CASig0PiK93M=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:424d:b0:428:bf2b:b13e with SMTP id g13-20020a056402424d00b00428bf2bb13emr13417129edb.306.1652386303967; Thu, 12 May 2022 13:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <F6744CFE-D61F-41F1-9D95-8F322EDB6E0F@ietf.org> <F9CEB983-06B6-42E9-BAAA-D8F829CA32B3@live555.com> <CAC8QAccwyROv188W_GqBVpU4TgwZ9ESSg96P_HMc50Wva6LOsg@mail.gmail.com> <DC8A79944855148CBDA8A40E@PSB> <7F8FD4B5-6B9D-439F-9969-D92D18E7DFB7@amsl.com> <8c55e13a-e384-0bea-852c-f16965bda535@network-heretics.com> <AB2DB5B6-7DA5-4953-B5C7-88198752A881@live555.com> <96a4470f-b710-f95e-47c8-8fa79275e520@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <96a4470f-b710-f95e-47c8-8fa79275e520@network-heretics.com>
From: Mary B <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 15:11:32 -0500
Message-ID: <CABmDk8knrfTpr6WOrmTNTbh=SsY3M2mZXVP5UG3+O4XRa4-uug@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Registration open for IETF 114
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Cc: "<ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ae04d505ded62ac5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/2YZkutyZ_TOWbAfGJ1Hd_9tPuUI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 20:11:46 -0000

n Mon, May 9, 2022 at 2:48 PM Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
wrote:

> On 5/9/22 15:10, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>
> This is not only extremely unreasonable, it's insulting to the very notion of IETF and offensive to many of those who aren't funded by Big Companies.  It's appalling.
>
> Maybe you haven’t been paying attention to hotel/motel rates in the past couple of years, but they have been undergoing significant inflation.
>
> It might be a bit of a stretch to describe $US190/day as “very reasonable”, but - for a high-end hotel in the center of a large city - this hardly counts as “unreasonable” anymore, sadly.
>
> Since when is "high-end" a requirement for IETF?
>
[MB] I don't think "high-end" is the right term.  I do think "full service"
is more likely - e.g. on site restaurants, bar, 24 hour staff (including
security), etc.   If you look at prices for other hotels in the area, this
is a good price.  [/MB]

>
> If there aren't reasonably-priced rooms near an IETF venue, it's not a
> suitable venue.
>
Alternative hotels don't need to be "high-end", IMO.  They need to be safe,
> have plenty of rooms available, be close enough to walk to, and have
> reliable Wi-Fi.
>
[MB] There are reasonably priced rooms near the venue.  I found a number of
apartments for around $125 through VRBO.  If I attend, I would likely stay
somewhere like that as the hotel rooms don't even have fridges.
Personally, my only concern is safety as downtown Philadelphia is not the
safest city.   But, I've stayed there before when traveling for work and
the area near the hotel and the route to places like Whole Foods, which is
walking distance, was generally safe.    As far as Wifi, I don't see that
as a problem in the city. [/MB]

>
>

> Keith
>
> p.s.  I don't want to insist that anyone be uncomfortable as a condition
> of participation in IETF, just like I don't want to insist that
> participants should have to spend hundreds of dollars per night to do so.
> But it seems to me that most people who really want to get work done don't
> need "high-end" accommodations.   And if "high-end" is more important in
> venue/hotel selection than "affordable", something's seriously out of whack.
>
>
>