Re: Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Fri, 28 February 2020 04:54 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 755D43A0F7D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 20:54:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YBh_Ipe0VAF8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 20:54:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2708E3A0F7C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 20:54:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.10] (unknown [181.45.84.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5CF3982D50; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 05:54:42 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Cc: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>
References: <876c9105-3da4-e614-2db0-bea025b54663@si6networks.com> <7749f91f-03f1-cc14-bae8-5fe68c88879f@si6networks.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200227151910.1077c270@elandnews.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Message-ID: <c3a9c332-2ca0-0347-8414-5c5bdcb73f45@si6networks.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 01:54:35 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20200227151910.1077c270@elandnews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3wvbU9SPAVqQmQKsDnd0aNsJmk0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 04:54:46 -0000

On 27/2/20 21:05, S Moonesamy wrote:
> Hi Fernando,
> 
> [Cc trimmed to ietf@ and Area Director]
> 
> At 01:42 PM 27-02-2020, Fernando Gont wrote:
>> I've raised the topic to our AD (Suresh), to the IAB, and on the 
>> arch-d list before, but so far haven't been lucky or seen anything 
>> meaningful happen in this area.
>>
>> I have also submitted an errata to make RFC8200 even more clear on the 
>> topic, but it remains unprocessed.
>>
>> So my questions are:
>>
>> * On the technical area:
>>
>>  + Is IPv6 an End To End protocol?  Or is the IETF's stance that 
>> routers are free to mangle with the packet structure as they please?
> 
> The IETF's stance is usually documented in RFCs.  Routers are free to 
> mangle with packet structure. 

They clearly are not. I have no idea whatsoever where you got this from.

Yes, there's no protocol police. But such behavior does not conform to 
the IPv6 standard, nor with the existing architecture.

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492