RE: Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)

Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org> Fri, 28 February 2020 03:26 UTC

Return-Path: <masinter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8093A0E62 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 19:26:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IkSMSFgtgyxa for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 19:26:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62e.google.com (mail-pl1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9018D3A0DFA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 19:26:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id y8so649343pll.13 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 19:26:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :thread-index; bh=SgJqLQQWCnM8b+9a6C/STVflIhVb1W4YPErEPm2q5G4=; b=fxwlToV6cTpbsiD7OtVBpetJPrnhu1W5TVt3TFi/Z5fan+6fGXK9xSuCgz2G7Y5lHv 90IqauO9E4hbF7zqi9uwsubINMtwm1F1G3IFk+2tmazQUDQydFtTvlhXFDPS5WqBEPXd 9T5HBE/mGCswe03X7BvevK61LPfJ1jse4SOkO8zETDwDcWStMj/i6wyXGANMhmt+cJic uBeA37G3dSGOmiXVfYlAI5D2Xt5pLV7pBIRVbVA5q2jRdtTY5RzX7MxwCO867NTz7bg8 +bBsU3Pm0RKQynmb+cr3kG/kP3SDRJKcW4t10UNp1N+iuF6FD/6QK7dwHqwJb3gbUVZX 4Y9w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject :date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:thread-index; bh=SgJqLQQWCnM8b+9a6C/STVflIhVb1W4YPErEPm2q5G4=; b=ak269cDgqiJhgmimuLONip3nDTaaKx+UUDPfkU9jYXnKAtY2E8BwAvwmUj5+SAV72l m9TuGwpf27KK7kUuU5ffKNWMAbAiV1snQjLXqNhWrX9kGvlR/VIiPjBVDSak2dUML7fF 4BHJ1rGp9ZLW4nXo5rfZ2Z8IqYo8z249Ln6YJc7bSngQq3d4VX9Q4Pg6COOU+Pmm7moA M6+Cm16m4+PXdwKFY8eOXOb8bLBNeuDMH+TGICY/WWmDUdDb1Ak9NMLKcBh0FUnPOesq R3QEFTP+fPe/AEjCBs2Yq2jKyY3w1ZneSlXpOS7p/Na7z19Y05i2P4CWzmOZ6FGoJ1dB oYgQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVRNf91DIYU6+MmDAs11NcRSYqQoJFVan45952fA6zZaU43duky mkYCL6hFk65VQROh6uz6AX4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyOqwYYc+Kn48S1xzRUgFGlS8e5Je1BO9VsO5zJnacLCWsnW7F4Hm3FwbeerpPgigmGT1X5yg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:343:: with SMTP id 61mr2049135pld.332.1582860378724; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 19:26:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TVPC (c-67-169-101-78.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.169.101.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a36sm7971749pga.32.2020.02.27.19.26.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 19:26:17 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Larry Masinter <masinter@gmail.com>
From: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
X-Google-Original-From: "Larry Masinter" <lmm@acm.org>
To: 'Fernando Gont' <fgont@si6networks.com>, 'S Moonesamy' <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Cc: 'Suresh Krishnan' <suresh@kaloom.com>, '神明達哉' <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
References: <876c9105-3da4-e614-2db0-bea025b54663@si6networks.com> <7749f91f-03f1-cc14-bae8-5fe68c88879f@si6networks.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200227151910.1077c270@elandnews.com> <e90c70d8-12b0-b3c7-384b-fd9e5fc39a11@si6networks.com>
In-Reply-To: <e90c70d8-12b0-b3c7-384b-fd9e5fc39a11@si6networks.com>
Subject: RE: Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 19:26:17 -0800
Message-ID: <021c01d5ede6$d6f81060$84e83120$@acm.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: AQDJEtxJbULfx13nHUHCl0Mh2QZLHQKPDtsHAfytVf8CUfI2c6oSuU1Q
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ud4YpZR6iDZGnmeRmdAk-fgeEsc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 03:26:27 -0000

If you want to talk about specifications and their relationship to the protocols they specify,

    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aEaOvS3rKret7IwyYeawL8rCby8b7erNEZTYXclDBbU/edit?usp=sharing

on evolution of interface standards