Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 27 February 2020 23:11 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966BA3A0859 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:11:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ANa1sPdP8ehz for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:11:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32f.google.com (mail-ot1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 200483A0850 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:11:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id z9so878465oth.5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:11:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6Ayd4frP60SHmOz+7aP4Pym11T4N/LEa2fwqUCbxd1A=; b=b2HoSDTZZuQwGC8hUE4Hu37gzCIOfi/oIQJ0mAhAlveOwWVIsxWV35DHsGx3B4gV+x g9WT0RPteIA5TaEIDgdiotBYYLjYGaJq/VuWGPniWAvfBsaPBVxqdLjbT+bTpUVhoOZx h02U9EzowryoYXL4aDdjF1gsCIXRA1QKYVmco/ItuU6u83UlR4DibgO0XiRiSF3jZxWt Xh7YNqw9rum+lrb2MmenFbrgUFYLMoERW7b+HeF5L4YoTVOq4u42pRA3TWYMzdkLFfwO hcGSZqvDHWk86m2dABeYY9fHECiT8W/6Ulz8Lli4IcWNUTICCvmkrSrfbdiUPyJ8MwhD 2Idw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6Ayd4frP60SHmOz+7aP4Pym11T4N/LEa2fwqUCbxd1A=; b=p5q7/BdU4NxhK0RWIfck0t2pDS0hPH1fABBN1eY8dKehwp0a7pwWsuj/DRyKtFMzwU b4dC/vEiWuWX53z+9d66sKumIe2JljHjAeP+RutmSlSss0xbrPAjpp6C3j/B8w75kMnJ Ozt6hsvZKe+4Acrb3oJxr3Vphc5GYPpMAE1z3r4Oxb97Ka+yEYT5UG0H4xhncwIiAlk0 m+QVzwASNdtxvpX7rHt844hwvggdWeU/cQtFVl+vMWwNBx6JZBQhQVOaAL5zP2hTag5H reckxnSTS/YZ5UHa5nrYIi5KUNPF1JFTfJOn1bapwZZOf3t5oulwTiVJa1H0QTNXhxfb yyVg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXWJ9yON4yIrD9FYwsNt5/edFY7bP1xn/QNh9bJyNhvYIrv1WLA nGWcNMBgxFg5D7/ulo7T6NTLmkjw58iP1PleBedMaQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqznMOdVZutlQ6R0FxFE24MSs4TLRW/emjhQBODrGJvHzSVmoZ1Z1R/rvnfdyuiUci+DEo4vDRvyfU1gtpSo/68=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:160c:: with SMTP id g12mr1023726otr.82.1582845069190; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:11:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <876c9105-3da4-e614-2db0-bea025b54663@si6networks.com> <7749f91f-03f1-cc14-bae8-5fe68c88879f@si6networks.com> <CALx6S36wN7VEi_rxLC1ETcTvkGaPhs20KhQrGWAGGTrCL5OT+g@mail.gmail.com> <d41a94f5ede994b9e14605871f9f7140@strayalpha.com> <CAOj+MMFo=7G6ygCNEkwNXzzzdbYh7Aw6SzcjL_Atg6RGyDJdjA@mail.gmail.com> <435b3561fd446be01d7d464e0c0762c5@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <435b3561fd446be01d7d464e0c0762c5@strayalpha.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:10:59 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMFL_O7MRUc_Lea=_qp0Lkpd5n16naSeb9Gr9PifUz=1_A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
To: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
Cc: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>, Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>, architecture-discuss@iab.org, Internet Area <int-area@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001588c6059f96d64e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/NqzSGvPUiHZ05f4113PgmMC6gZk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 23:11:18 -0000

> It does matter whether it happens at the IP source (origin host, tunnel
ingress, etc.) or on the path of that header.

It happens on tunnel ingress and tunnel egress nodes (egress = node listed
in DA of the packet).