Re: Last Call on draft-ietf-pim-registry-03.txt

[Julian Reschke <[e-mail]>]

On 14.01.2011 15:04, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
> 13.01.2011 18:19, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 13.01.2011 17:14, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
>>> <...>
>>> Documents that create a new namespace (or modify the definition of an
>>> existing space) and that expect IANA to play a role in maintaining
>>> that space (e.g., serving as a repository for registered values) MUST
>>> provide clear instructions on details of the namespace. In
>>> particular, instructions *MUST* include:
>>> <...>
>>> 5) Initial assignments and reservations. Clear instructions should be
>>> provided to identify any initial assignments or registrations. In
>>> addition, any ranges that are to be reserved for "Private Use",
>>> "Reserved", **"Unassigned"**, etc. should be *clearly indicated*.
>>> <...>
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> There's still no "MUST" applying to unassigned code points. Note the
>> "In addition" and "should".
> There is MUST before the list of the criteria for the documents defining
> the registry. This MUST applies to everything mentioned in this list.
> ...

Well, we can go on repeating this exchange over and over, or just stop. 
I'll stop.

Best regards, Julian