Re: Last Call on draft-ietf-pim-registry-03.txt

[Mykyta Yevstifeyev <[e-mail]>]

13.01.2011 18:19, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 13.01.2011 17:14, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
>> <...>
>> Documents that create a new namespace (or modify the definition of an
>> existing space) and that expect IANA to play a role in maintaining
>> that space (e.g., serving as a repository for registered values) MUST
>> provide clear instructions on details of the namespace. In
>> particular, instructions *MUST* include:
>> <...>
>> 5) Initial assignments and reservations. Clear instructions should be
>> provided to identify any initial assignments or registrations. In
>> addition, any ranges that are to be reserved for "Private Use",
>> "Reserved", **"Unassigned"**, etc. should be *clearly indicated*.
>> <...>
>
> Yes.
>
> There's still no "MUST" applying to unassigned code points. Note the 
> "In addition" and "should".
There is MUST before the list of the criteria for the documents defining 
the registry.  This MUST applies to everything mentioned in this list.

Mykyta
>
>> ...
>
> Best regards, Julian
>