IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Last Call on draft-ietf-pim-registry-03.txt

Adrian Farrel <Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com> Wed, 12 January 2011 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134F028C11A for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 06:20:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.557
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.557 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.042, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JjAM3kYNVT9T for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 06:20:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usaga03-in.huawei.com (usaga03-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.220]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CACC328C0E8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 06:20:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (usaga03-in [172.18.4.17]) by usaga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LEW00L50YLY1M@usaga03-in.huawei.com> for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 08:22:46 -0600 (CST)
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) by usaga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0LEW00IATYLWMR@usaga03-in.huawei.com> for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 08:22:46 -0600 (CST)
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:22:44 +0000
From: Adrian Farrel <Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: Last Call on draft-ietf-pim-registry-03.txt
In-reply-to: <4D2DB36C.7070107@gmx.de>
To: 'Julian Reschke' <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-id: <01da01cbb264$2f1462d0$8d3d2870$@huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-language: en-gb
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Thread-index: AQKkr0ca3wjOiQC5JrjJaFD3Dw+epwKlsayuANzo8E6R/1P5oA==
References: <AANLkTin+wxG6oSrvux6DuqZNA1hLGALmozfxzhhGxT3+@mail.gmail.com> <01bc01cbb25c$41590700$c40b1500$@huawei.com> <4D2DB36C.7070107@gmx.de>
Cc: 'The IETF' <ietf@ietf.org>, stig@cisco.com
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:20:28 -0000

Entirely at random I clicked on:

http://www.iana.org/assignments/aaa-parameters/aaa-parameters.xhtml
http://www.iana.org/assignments/calipso/calipso.xhtml
http://www.iana.org/assignments/lmp-parameters

Looks like IANA tries to fill up all the blanks with markers of "unassigned".

Is that harmful?

Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de]
> Sent: 12 January 2011 13:58
> To: Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com
> Cc: 'Mykyta Yevstifeyev'; 'The IETF'; stig@cisco.com
> Subject: Re: Last Call on draft-ietf-pim-registry-03.txt
> 
> On 12.01.2011 14:25, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> > ...
> >> Moreover, the initial contents of the regsitry does not mention that
> >> values that are Unassigned.
> >
> > Yeah, probably worth adding an entry...
> >
> > 11-14  Unassigned
> > ...
> 
> My understanding was that if something isn't registered then it's
> unassigned. When did we start to list those in a registry?
> 
>  > ...
> 
> Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email