IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call on draft-ietf-pim-registry-03.txt

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 12 January 2011 13:55 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C013A6B2F for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 05:55:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.237
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.237 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.638, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PBLIOtDhEZdu for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 05:55:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C05473A6B27 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 05:55:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2011 13:58:08 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.133]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp024) with SMTP; 12 Jan 2011 14:58:08 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/KsRkcD0bKZQxSQ/OW1vaprTASaYJzqfhF2VDeXx 98JaVKsMUcq9fO
Message-ID: <4D2DB36C.7070107@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:58:04 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com
Subject: Re: Last Call on draft-ietf-pim-registry-03.txt
References: <AANLkTin+wxG6oSrvux6DuqZNA1hLGALmozfxzhhGxT3+@mail.gmail.com> <01bc01cbb25c$41590700$c40b1500$@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <01bc01cbb25c$41590700$c40b1500$@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: 'The IETF' <ietf@ietf.org>, stig@cisco.com
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:55:52 -0000

On 12.01.2011 14:25, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> ...
>> Moreover, the initial contents of the regsitry does not mention that
>> values that are Unassigned.
>
> Yeah, probably worth adding an entry...
>
> 11-14  Unassigned
> ...

My understanding was that if something isn't registered then it's 
unassigned. When did we start to list those in a registry?

 > ...

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email