Re: Use of "unassigned" in IANA registries

Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Sun, 16 January 2011 22:28 UTC

Return-Path: <iljitsch@muada.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 414233A67DF for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 14:28:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l64LdR910Tqw for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 14:28:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sequoia.muada.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:1af8:2:5::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7CB93A6C2B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 14:28:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1f0b:1289:223:12ff:fe56:36b2] ([IPv6:2001:470:1f0b:1289:223:12ff:fe56:36b2]) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id p0GMU8o5076130 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 16 Jan 2011 23:30:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
Subject: Re: Use of "unassigned" in IANA registries
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <201101142206.p0EM6XNB027935@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 23:30:28 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <06456B13-F9E5-4530-B7E8-7CF7F41000E0@muada.com>
References: <201101142206.p0EM6XNB027935@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
To: mrex@sap.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, paul.hoffman@vpnc.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 22:28:03 -0000

On 14 jan 2011, at 23:06, Martin Rex wrote:

> Frankly, I'm actually more concerned about code assignments for
> severely IPR-impaired algorithms (e.g. Elliptic Curve related)
> than about GOST.  (Admittedly, the GOST 34.10-2001 signature
> algorithm appears to use Elliptic curve math, and it's entirely
> unclear to me whether and how existing EC-related IPR claims might
> apply.)

Withholding registration just means that people are going to pick an unregistered number with all the problems that that entails. In cases where there are no scarcity issues registration should happen as long as there is a reasonable expectation of non-negligible use, regardless of whether the registered protocol is endorsed by the IETF (whatever that means) or IANA.