Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy use &ct.

Daniel Senie <dts@senie.com> Mon, 15 October 2007 21:27 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhXTY-0000sq-VJ; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:27:48 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhXTW-0000kG-9D for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:27:46 -0400
Received: from parsley.amaranth.net ([204.10.1.23]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhXTO-0005UH-4V for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:27:44 -0400
Received: from Clary.senie.com ([192.168.8.126]) (authenticated bits=0) by parsley.amaranth.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l9FLR4t4012748 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:27:05 -0400
Message-Id: <200710152127.l9FLR4t4012748@parsley.amaranth.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:09:07 -0400
To: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
From: Daniel Senie <dts@senie.com>
In-Reply-To: <4713CDE6.7010603@bogus.com>
References: <941D5DCD8C42014FAF70FB7424686DCF01C26BAA@eusrcmw721.eamcs.ericsson.se> <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C31661557084EBF@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <20071015172939.GP67213@verdi> <200710151854.l9FIshJe022814@parsley.amaranth.net> <4713CDE6.7010603@bogus.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"; x-avg-checked="avg-ok-666D2D0B"
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/4540/Sat Oct 13 21:43:55 2007 on parsley.amaranth.net
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 769a46790fb42fbb0b0cc700c82f7081
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy use &ct.
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

At 04:30 PM 10/15/2007, Joel Jaeggli wrote:

>Daniel Senie wrote:
> > At 01:29 PM 10/15/2007, John Leslie wrote:
> >
> >> Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker@verisign.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Whether your objective is to reduce carbon emissions because of
> >> > global warming concerns or reduce dependence on fossil fuels that are
> >> > increasingly in short supply, there is a real incentive to reduce
> >> > energy use.
> >> >
> >> > If teleconferencing actually worked the need to hold face to face
> >> > meetings would be reduced.
> >>
> >>    I am constantly surprised how little interest there is within IETF
> >> for teleconferecing that works well.
> >
> > Indeed. I raised this point over the years. Even offering to pay a
> > "remote attendance fee" if there were in fact the ability to see and
> > hear sessions, and participate. The IETF for many years crowed about the
> > Mbone connectivity as being innovative, but got stuck there, and didn't
> > progress when comercial solutions bypassed that flawed technology.
>
>I don't recall crowing about multicast.
>
>I also don't recall you volunteering to show up and help enable remote
>participation...

No. I offered that I would pay a fee and NOT show up.

>The volunteers built a model that was sustainable with a modest amount
>of capital and time. both jabber and and streaming audio.
>
>I respectfully suggest that if you put more in, you might get more out.

So in order to participate remotely, I needed to show up and run 
cameras. I'm sorry, but that does not make sense. I'm also sorry if 
you thought I was criticizing the people who put in the time to 
broadcast the meetings over Mbone. It was a great effort. Not one I 
could watch, mind you, since multicast connectivity didn't reach most 
of the places I've worked, but nice that someone did it nonetheless.

What I suggested, at plenaries and such, was that I would have been 
happy to pay a meeting fee, despite not being there, if the money 
went toward interactive, remote attendance instead of to cookies, ice 
cream, pretzels and danish. 


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf