Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy use &ct.
Daniel Senie <dts@senie.com> Mon, 15 October 2007 18:55 UTC
Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhV6C-0000p0-J9; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:55:32 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhV69-0000nB-Uv for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:55:29 -0400
Received: from parsley.amaranth.net ([204.10.1.23]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhV64-0006tJ-Jk for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:55:29 -0400
Received: from Clary.senie.com ([192.168.8.126]) (authenticated bits=0) by parsley.amaranth.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l9FIshJe022814 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:54:46 -0400
Message-Id: <200710151854.l9FIshJe022814@parsley.amaranth.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:54:26 -0400
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: Daniel Senie <dts@senie.com>
In-Reply-To: <20071015172939.GP67213@verdi>
References: <941D5DCD8C42014FAF70FB7424686DCF01C26BAA@eusrcmw721.eamcs.ericsson.se> <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C31661557084EBF@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <20071015172939.GP67213@verdi>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"; x-avg-checked="avg-ok-666D2D0B"
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/4540/Sat Oct 13 21:43:55 2007 on parsley.amaranth.net
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: a7d6aff76b15f3f56fcb94490e1052e4
Subject: Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy use &ct.
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
At 01:29 PM 10/15/2007, John Leslie wrote: >Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker@verisign.com> wrote: > > > > Whether your objective is to reduce carbon emissions because of > > global warming concerns or reduce dependence on fossil fuels that are > > increasingly in short supply, there is a real incentive to reduce > > energy use. > > > > If teleconferencing actually worked the need to hold face to face > > meetings would be reduced. > > I am constantly surprised how little interest there is within IETF >for teleconferecing that works well. Indeed. I raised this point over the years. Even offering to pay a "remote attendance fee" if there were in fact the ability to see and hear sessions, and participate. The IETF for many years crowed about the Mbone connectivity as being innovative, but got stuck there, and didn't progress when comercial solutions bypassed that flawed technology. > > By work I mean really work, not almost, not provided there is no NAT, > > not provided the firewall has pinhole router configuration. > > These are all "security" issues, for which we could find end-runs. >The problem I see is that we just don't care. :^( Indeed, we can all use various conferencing methods today, which all work regardless of firewalls, whether incorporating NAT or not. But of course those technologies were not born of the IETF. The marketplace notwithstanding, those approaches are given less credence. Perhaps if the IETF did have to consider its carbon footprint in its meeting planning, those ideas would be given some credence. I rarely get on airplanes any more, and so have not been to an IETF meeting in some time. The "appearance of security" in place to harass the public and make us feel safe as un-screened cargo is loaded into cargo holds below your feet is not worth the aggrivation. My vote is to cut my own carbon footprint by not flying. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- RE: Travel Considerations Darryl (Dassa) Lynch
- Travel Considerations Eric Burger
- Re: Travel Considerations Stewart Bryant
- Re: Travel Considerations Eric Burger
- Re: Travel Considerations Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Travel Considerations Dan Harkins
- Re: Travel Considerations Dave Crocker
- Re: Travel Considerations James M. Polk
- RE: Travel Considerations Eric Gray
- Re: Travel Considerations Melinda Shore
- Re: Travel Considerations Dan Harkins
- RE: Travel Considerations Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: Travel Considerations Clint Chaplin
- RE: Travel Considerations michael.dillon
- Re: Travel Considerations Fred Baker
- Re: Travel Considerations Fred Baker
- Re: Travel Considerations Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Travel Considerations Dan Harkins
- Re: Travel Considerations Jari Arkko
- Re: Travel Considerations Dave Crocker
- The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy use &c… Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy us… John Leslie
- Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy us… Daniel Senie
- Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy us… Joel Jaeggli
- Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy us… Daniel Senie
- Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy us… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy us… Douglas Otis
- Re: The IETF duty for Carbon emissions, energy us… Iljitsch van Beijnum