Re: Travel Considerations

Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com> Fri, 12 October 2007 20:04 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IgQk3-0000FC-IP; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:04:15 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IgQk2-0000EY-86 for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:04:14 -0400
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IgQk1-0002oY-2L for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:04:14 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,268,1188792000"; d="scan'208";a="73941549"
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2007 16:04:11 -0400
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l9CK4AUD000829; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:04:10 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l9CK418p019688; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:04:10 GMT
Received: from xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:04:06 -0400
Received: from 10.86.115.70 ([10.86.115.70]) by xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:04:05 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 16:04:03 -0400
From: Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com>
To: Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com>, "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>, Eric Burger <eburger@bea.com>
Message-ID: <C3354B73.2B9B2%mshore@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: Travel Considerations
Thread-Index: AcgNBXKA7FziYFrATNSMTW9SnKPK4QAAOACQAAEtq4c=
In-Reply-To: <941D5DCD8C42014FAF70FB7424686DCF01C26BAA@eusrcmw721.eamcs.ericsson.se>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Oct 2007 20:04:06.0330 (UTC) FILETIME=[0B2C19A0:01C80D0B]
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.1181-5.000.1023-15478.002
X-TM-AS-Result: No--15.320500-8.000000-31
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No
X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=487; t=1192219450; x=1193083450; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=mshore@cisco.com; z=From:=20Melinda=20Shore=20<mshore@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20Travel=20Considerations |Sender:=20 |To:=20Eric=20Gray=20<eric.gray@ericsson.com>, =20=22James=20M.=20Polk=22= 20<jmpolk@cisco.com>, =0A=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20Dan=20Harkins=20<dharkins@ lounge.org>,=20Eric=20Burger=20<eburger@bea.com>; bh=snWHhgf0wQXTq7FJsdCFwR47v4FtOYXg3D9zuCUc8jM=; b=efJkhLMKmFL5WWXLRJLgqdIEgDHHSakLiRXZfX/N0e3qvh2kV8AhhA0wDFImjfMxCJmhVdtq Sps9g66BY5UhqG64xKJQmvpbqNhMW3Hnsd7tIfYuDrdxpwBy4qRM41IA;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1; header.From=mshore@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim1001 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Travel Considerations
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On 10/12/07 3:31 PM, "Eric Gray" <eric.gray@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Time out for station identification; this is the "Internet
> Engineering Task Force."

I tend to think of it as at least in part an engineering question.
Obvious questions about tradeoffs and whatnot, and then the question
of engineering for errors/exceptions.  What are the consequences of
assuming <x> and being incorrect?  What are the consequences of being
incorrect about the alternative?  etc.

Melinda

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf