Re: Travel Considerations

"Dan Harkins" <dharkins@lounge.org> Fri, 12 October 2007 18:30 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IgPHh-0004Bq-Iw; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:30:53 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IgPHg-0004BS-Is for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:30:52 -0400
Received: from colo.trepanning.net ([69.55.226.174] helo=mail1.trepanning.net) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IgPHX-0007yc-1A for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 14:30:52 -0400
Received: from www.trepanning.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.trepanning.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740A51FA6101; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 216.31.249.246 (SquirrelMail authenticated user dharkins@lounge.org) by www.trepanning.net with HTTP; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <28109.216.31.249.246.1192213828.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
In-Reply-To: <A5E9CBACB726CB4BAA3DAFF0925C188F01DA406C@repbex01.amer.bea.com>
References: <A5E9CBACB726CB4BAA3DAFF0925C188F01DA406C@repbex01.amer.bea.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:30:28 -0700
From: Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>
To: Eric Burger <eburger@bea.com>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 769a46790fb42fbb0b0cc700c82f7081
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Travel Considerations
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

  You're assuming that if 1000 people decide not to fly to Prague
some weekend that the number of planes burning jet fuel to fly there
will be different. I don't think so.

  Maybe you can start a "Boycott Prague The Spoke City" campaign which,
if wildly successful, will reduce demand to fly there by some discernable
amount and thereby reduce the number of planes flying there and the amount
of jet fuel they would've burned. Well, as long as the planes that aren't
flying to Prague aren't used to fly to Heathrow or Frankfurt or some other
hub city. Also doubtful.

  I do not intend on making ietf-discuss into a forum for discussing
the pluses and minuses resulting from a degree centigrade temperature
change but let me just say that "the planet wins" is a somewhat dubious
statement.

  Dan.

On Fri, October 12, 2007 7:32 am, Eric Burger wrote:
> Here is an interesting optimization problem: it turns out the most
> polluting part of a conference is people taking jets to fly to the
> conference.  Minimize that and the planet wins.  Favors hub cities over
> spokes, like San Diego or Prague, where you "can't get there from here",
> no matter where "here" is.
>
> See http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/318/5847/36.pdf
>
> Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
> information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
> entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
> and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by
> email and then delete it.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf