Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))

John Stracke <jstracke@centive.com> Tue, 01 April 2003 15:35 UTC

Received: from ran.ietf.org (ran.ietf.org [10.27.6.60]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA20771; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:35:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordomo by ran.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 190Nz9-0001Kt-00 for ietf-list@ran.ietf.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2003 10:47:39 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([10.27.2.28] helo=ietf.org) by ran.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 19070B-0004mR-00 for ietf@ran.ietf.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:39:35 -0500
Received: from carwash.centive.com (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id QAA25189 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:23:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from minglewood.incentivesystems.com ([172.16.0.25]) by carwash.centive.com (NAVGW 2.5.2.11) with SMTP id M2003033116300112687 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:30:01 -0500
Received: from centive.com ([10.10.48.156]) by minglewood.incentivesystems.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:23:18 -0500
Message-ID: <3E88B1C6.3080403@centive.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:23:18 -0500
From: John Stracke <jstracke@centive.com>
Organization: Centive
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
References: <077601c2f7be$e0fcdc70$ee1a4104@eagleswings> <3E88A268.4010309@cisco.com> <012101c2f7c9$9a9a5d10$93b58742@ssprunk>
In-Reply-To: <012101c2f7c9$9a9a5d10$93b58742@ssprunk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Mar 2003 21:23:18.0288 (UTC) FILETIME=[BF7D5900:01C2F7CB]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Stephen Sprunk wrote:

>I've dealt with many companies interconnecting where both use RFC1918
>space -- NAT is the first thing discussed.  You forget, these people are
>connecting for a _business reason_ and there is real money to be lost if
>they mess up.
>  
>
And how much real money do they lose by having to work around those NATs?

-- 
/============================================================\
|John Stracke      |jstracke@centive.com                     |
|Principal Engineer|http://www.centive.com                   |
|Centive           |My opinions are my own.                  |
|============================================================|
|"God does not play games with His loyal servants." "Whoo-ee,|
|where have you *been*?" --_Good Omens_                      |
\============================================================/