RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))

"Jeroen Massar" <jeroen@unfix.org> Wed, 02 April 2003 19:46 UTC

Received: from ran.ietf.org (ran.ietf.org [10.27.6.60]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA25202; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 14:46:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordomo by ran.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 190oNZ-0002vB-00 for ietf-list@ran.ietf.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2003 14:58:37 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([10.27.2.28] helo=ietf.org) by ran.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 190oJp-0002lD-00 for ietf@ran.ietf.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2003 14:54:45 -0500
Received: from purgatory.unfix.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA24633 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 14:37:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by purgatory.unfix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34768F34; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 21:40:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from limbo (limbo.unfix.org [10.100.13.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by purgatory.unfix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49F389CD; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 21:40:06 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
To: alh-ietf@tndh.net, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 21:40:42 +0200
Organization: Unfix
Message-ID: <00ee01c2f94f$c0712b90$210d640a@unfix.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416
In-Reply-To: <099501c2f93a$4e62c370$ee1a4104@eagleswings>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS @ purgatory.unfix.org
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ietf.org id OAA25202

Tony Hain [mailto:alh-ietf@tndh.net] wrote:

> Jeroen Massar wrote:
> > ... That's also why IE in XP doesn't support it. 
> 
> Making claims that you know nothing about, only exposes your lack of
> clue.

Fortunatly I don't have to resolve to personal accusations
to get my point across. I cc:'d the people who really
know how the stuff works so they could comment on these statements. :)

Greets,
 Jeroen