RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))

Spencer Dawkins <spencer_dawkins@yahoo.com> Wed, 02 April 2003 13:19 UTC

Received: from ran.ietf.org (ran.ietf.org [10.27.6.60]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA08053; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:19:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordomo by ran.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 190iI8-0004Fw-00 for ietf-list@ran.ietf.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2003 08:28:36 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([10.27.2.28] helo=ietf.org) by ran.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 190iCe-00042j-00 for ietf@ran.ietf.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2003 08:22:56 -0500
Received: from web10903.mail.yahoo.com (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id IAA07737 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:06:05 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <20030402130833.67087.qmail@web10903.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [12.237.229.250] by web10903.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 02 Apr 2003 05:08:33 PST
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 05:08:33 -0800
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencer_dawkins@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
To: ietf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <002901c2f908$e5d1ed30$210d640a@unfix.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi, Jeroen,

Are you talking about
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2732.txt (PS)? 

My quick read of this RFC is that it says "don't use IPv6
literals without enclosing them in brackets", as in

      host          = hostname | IPv4address | IPv6reference
      ipv6reference = "[" IPv6address "]"

But that's not quite the same thing you said: "never use IPv6
IP's in URL's".

If you're talking about another reference, could you provide it?
A quick RFC search for "IPv6 URL" turned up only this RFC...

Thanks,

Spencer

--- Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org> wrote:
> Also there is a RFC which
> says to never use IPv6 IP's in URL's... That's also why
> IE in XP doesn't support it. "Host" is now an integral
> part of HTTP/1.1 and one can't even do without it anymore.