IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))

"Matt Crawford" <crawdad@fnal.gov> Mon, 31 March 2003 21:47 UTC

Received: from ran.ietf.org (ran.ietf.org [10.27.6.60]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA26342; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:47:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordomo by ran.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 1907Ic-0007CU-00 for ietf-list@ran.ietf.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:58:38 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([10.27.2.28] helo=ietf.org) by ran.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 1907Hi-0006mY-00 for ietf@ran.ietf.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:57:42 -0500
Received: from gungnir.fnal.gov (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA26185 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:41:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from gungnir.fnal.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gungnir.fnal.gov (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2VLhc2Y001999; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 15:43:38 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <200303312143.h2VLhc2Y001999@gungnir.fnal.gov>
To: Måns Nilsson <mansaxel@besserwisser.org>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
From: Matt Crawford <crawdad@fnal.gov>
Subject: Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 31 Mar 2003 23:00:01 +0200. <43450000.1049144401@localhost.besserwisser.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 15:43:38 -0600
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk

> All things SL is claimed to solve are solveable with unique
> addresses too, as long as you've got enough of them. The rest is
> just simple (perhaps tedious) work that every operations-aware
> person I know of would prefer to madness.

All right, how do you make internal site communications completely
oblivious to a change in your externally-visible routing prefix?

(Not everyone accepts that this is something necessary to achieve,
but some insist that it is.)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email