RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))

"Jeroen Massar" <jeroen@unfix.org> Wed, 02 April 2003 17:55 UTC

Received: from ran.ietf.org (ran.ietf.org [10.27.6.60]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA20573; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 12:55:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordomo by ran.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 190mbe-00050g-00 for ietf-list@ran.ietf.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2003 13:05:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([10.27.2.28] helo=ietf.org) by ran.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 190maF-0004tk-00 for ietf@ran.ietf.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2003 13:03:35 -0500
Received: from purgatory.unfix.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA20382 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 12:46:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by purgatory.unfix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3149D8F32; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 19:49:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from limbo (limbo.unfix.org [10.100.13.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by purgatory.unfix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E918F25; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 19:48:58 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
To: 'Keith Moore' <moore@cs.utk.edu>, 'John C Klensin' <john-ietf@jck.com>
Cc: bmanning@ISI.EDU, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...))
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 19:49:41 +0200
Organization: Unfix
Message-ID: <00c401c2f940$3d3a9db0$210d640a@unfix.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416
In-Reply-To: <20030402120337.7284bb8f.moore@cs.utk.edu>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS @ purgatory.unfix.org
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ietf.org id MAA20573

Keith Moore wrote:

<Large snip>

> I could certainly make a case for some apps to have their own naming
> systems and their own name-to-address lookup mechanisms independent of
> DNS, or more generally, for alternate means of mapping resource names
> (say URNs) to IP addresses that did not involve DNS names or DNS
> queries.  But it's difficult to believe that such apps would 
> not employ
> DNS names at all - if nothing else, for initial configuration.

You might almost forget about SMB/CIFS :)
No DNS in there and most people use it daily without even realising it.

Greets,
 Jeroen