Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.

Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> Thu, 20 February 2020 00:32 UTC

Return-Path: <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118ED120857 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:32:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outlook.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mVxe10lj4Bbh for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:32:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR03-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092072087.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.72.87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 320ED120133 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:32:48 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=LmQ6KBXj777LhatB/1Hua1F5EFkIipZCRSjxroBKLi+CNXS35BbecpxBzTHtrTYKDDjE9md33S9DPRL7I3DdcpOcdJnSWUmojq6OmXDmRkZaL9IcgWebDa2+XQ+VeWftpphIV3hCku3ZqFJt1g95gJ3EVKBhAcDLq+BlJWXtLYH92G90fUrF3pE6aR6sFKUwp4owZMAc6bybeHu566SBK4ptHDhOJ1fSu8adom5CgcoBPcBRDxVhVjAtC8QkmUzLWX9YaJrPbg10h1Rw1j656LcFYYiLG40AprKzDZ7/v7VLuIu1xRRSPLsK3BXwA2ArG3E/u6rYfRcX8OSOS3sTHA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Ecp6vvXPVjGBX8ptVkd9OW5BbGhW3m/fOQOgJ3tiIdk=; b=i5e6jo53ihUhjGCwXPhtVRQhDOl0loE/KNpwU5IJObTwp/rxLmFF9CpAfboayuYYoTZHFn8sbnRPLi4UlwRcXkohaujWZ77guNbRYaGosRKtSmXA0ZeBfu8gZdpxe922x+Tq1ZZyDzxucPcuu2vptR4eCcIVMd01JiQ1UvEMuAdJmGRXsUR4RwvTGbZEijGDCnU41PvgPn8BZmrG8TJi6DChz5luFuo6cotOQtZvZ0h6JkPPwJQV9dMOdFVS6CFij+lgUNmV164K1C0YSqqokyDuLrXcdaOPcZKubSyl8d+5bEgcPomwGN0aHqnUTvCEvUFKRr8NTtdqFpK3XK+V4w==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Ecp6vvXPVjGBX8ptVkd9OW5BbGhW3m/fOQOgJ3tiIdk=; b=cINVQRBwywX3LWhH5Jy/OfzjShbl4g9cA5ylkfcnOGrMdNPQAjP0DqACHTwNE+JXaE1r1ACvxa1SRe7QW9vNZnBCo6EKZbtRG5GAZa2X+wcbYMy6HucxWP34lSTfyytJ8IJtJD2BbREb6XSLiqjFDoxMwk2ylyn9yw6LDrZYdVCW9jEhXSRcIRPK8xwfiUQUChLwocIzyMHwSIHkCdGfC3GJTSFWwee004MVTIvrc3FDivmXbCsKFlKzrmz5N98Gqa6RAPnCmJO9b6WwZz54hH/sJBrFB27grdgtdKz5aqcpFKCRTim9gCUw/lT7UB0EPkjmrsKhlPtYT3e+efQyuw==
Received: from VE1EUR03FT029.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.18.59) by VE1EUR03HT045.eop-EUR03.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.19.88) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2665.18; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:32:45 +0000
Received: from PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.152.18.56) by VE1EUR03FT029.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.18.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2750.17 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:32:45 +0000
Received: from PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::b428:e305:c763:c9a3]) by PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::b428:e305:c763:c9a3%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2729.033; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:32:45 +0000
From: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
To: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
Thread-Topic: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
Thread-Index: AdXnL4CMqKHMj241QNOLcaD05q7rXAAIGzuAAADiyrAAC1bnAAAA5wmb
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:32:45 +0000
Message-ID: <PR3P194MB0843939F3B38426960A66E70AE130@PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <PR3P194MB0843ACAE01F33CEC57266A1AAE100@PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <EDAE6375-EE0B-4864-9834-C1FBC209D581@sobco.com> <PR3P194MB08431E138262F2A43C1D0621AE100@PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>, <8ADEA0E1-291A-4400-9925-F65A26116372@consulintel.es>
In-Reply-To: <8ADEA0E1-291A-4400-9925-F65A26116372@consulintel.es>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:1553A725D680B230B599100665361A657FB1CB43397764FA62EA7876A856E3B5; UpperCasedChecksum:E90FDD7033AB1E02DC80924B3ED8F876DCC6BE2F686AC1BBD744A06DED2FF866; SizeAsReceived:7085; Count:44
x-tmn: [WxsXLbYRiUQq8M94AP3YuSVlWy8JLouV]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-incomingheadercount: 44
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 6c19eeaa-8a3c-45e2-ec12-08d7b59c6768
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VE1EUR03HT045:
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: AoEHUHtUSCEvevrq8xb+11Qv56Q3QXSPuqq+IdH9j6p1A3kmE/n+vlOfTSwH06vItUnK9YEtXTObWl45NoyGlp8XmpVnU6OCNbZJlOGP1tUkIoXgweJrpPJfksQSVkiXYGmT0C9fPCYeYagylpZG77sYRRYwIzjbN1f5GbEZ17vHsnB1GH7hU7VXKlOILDvZQZGnJu5FMHLPaxkR7nIVBZKWIBsYU8FaCg5VOkUVvJw=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: CXLCRNeFHI5WFoLHwBopviTPYQu1gr7tGhxVGS8TbwF+dZscaXS4LFYSTij6UD2+2pH8/jXU1BFBuWNUf8xhFoDqS1Q5JfeETC3qynZrkwOabT5cKZFp0ncAsfFLsAtes1Bev6JXxgFIyzqB0CGtaA==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_PR3P194MB0843939F3B38426960A66E70AE130PR3P194MB0843EURP_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 6c19eeaa-8a3c-45e2-ec12-08d7b59c6768
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Feb 2020 00:32:45.0211 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VE1EUR03HT045
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/H8GQXrU53e4NFPAsR46NRJmo038>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:32:52 -0000

Regardless the different %s, lets take the average one, it can not make us optimistic and stop thinking about a better solution, we should learn from the long time passed without full migration occured, if we will wait till that happens, the division will occur which is not good for the internet, lets welcome new ideas and give it the space, time, and opportunity fairly, if it will be good then welcome, if not, trash is made for this.

Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

________________________________
From: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2020 2:00:58 AM
To: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.

And you're missing several points about how those stats are looked at.

The % in the stats shown by google/others is only what they can measure, but they can't measure *all*. There are countries (big ones) that don't allow measurements, or at least the same level of details, and however, are doing massive IPv6 deployments.

All the CDNs and caches have IPv6. The customers that have those caches and enable IPv6 for their subscribers, are getting ranges over 65%, sometimes even up to 85-90% of IPv6 traffic when mainly the subscribers are householders instead of big enterprises.

Also, the google (and others) measurements, show average worldwide, but if you look to many countries they have even surpassed the 50% or so.

Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet



El 20/2/20 5:38, "ietf en nombre de Khaled Omar" <ietf-bounces@ietf.org en nombre de eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> escribió:

    Since long time I was observing this, still almost the same, no clear progress occurred.

    Thanks,

    Khaled Omar

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Scott O. Bradner <sob@sobco.com>
    Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2020 8:11 PM
    To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
    Cc: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
    Subject: Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.

    Quite a few folk are already there - see https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html

    Scott





**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.