Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <> Thu, 20 February 2020 00:05 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F7CC12023E for <>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:05:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LJHiOyOqeG9t for <>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:05:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAB99120144 for <>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:05:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple;; s=MDaemon; t=1582157093; x=1582761893;; q=dns/txt; h=User-Agent:Date: Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic:References:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; bh=CV4N/I6M ocoNSegnwvvacKvEorCmr6vdmCZ7YUrXxc0=; b=q/Jpx90/X9nGfXLXz85u/aoh UHc/wsq8EM7w6JIkYBkhpqXF8nbEjjmw8FQNnzJZ8wpZENhWNCObblVgHgBS+Lhj wi1Xr3US3rj5DwdpAneN0ZisluJN+TQsWMoptfTh4XHuLsdMXKsUOWcpcbIeNAt0 7piYS4GMV8XokQ4U06o=
X-MDAV-Result: clean
X-MDAV-Processed:, Thu, 20 Feb 2020 01:04:53 +0100
X-Spam-Processed:, Thu, 20 Feb 2020 01:04:53 +0100
Received: from [] by (MDaemon PRO v16.5.2) with ESMTPA id md50000063648.msg for <>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 01:04:53 +0100
X-MDHelo: []
X-MDArrival-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 01:04:53 +0100
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:00:58 +1100
Subject: Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
To: IETF Rinse Repeat <>
Message-ID: <>
Thread-Topic: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
References: <PR3P194MB0843ACAE01F33CEC57266A1AAE100@PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <> <PR3P194MB08431E138262F2A43C1D0621AE100@PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <PR3P194MB08431E138262F2A43C1D0621AE100@PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:05:22 -0000

And you're missing several points about how those stats are looked at.

The % in the stats shown by google/others is only what they can measure, but they can't measure *all*. There are countries (big ones) that don't allow measurements, or at least the same level of details, and however, are doing massive IPv6 deployments.

All the CDNs and caches have IPv6. The customers that have those caches and enable IPv6 for their subscribers, are getting ranges over 65%, sometimes even up to 85-90% of IPv6 traffic when mainly the subscribers are householders instead of big enterprises.

Also, the google (and others) measurements, show average worldwide, but if you look to many countries they have even surpassed the 50% or so.


El 20/2/20 5:38, "ietf en nombre de Khaled Omar" < en nombre de> escribió:

    Since long time I was observing this, still almost the same, no clear progress occurred.
    Khaled Omar
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Scott O. Bradner <> 
    Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2020 8:11 PM
    To: Khaled Omar <>
    Cc: IETF Rinse Repeat <>
    Subject: Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
    Quite a few folk are already there - see

IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.