IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ITU-T Dubai Meeting

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Fri, 03 August 2012 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3BFC21F8DD7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 08:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VraIUpomzqIn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 08:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from trantor.virtualized.org (trantor.virtualized.org [199.48.134.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF5921F8DCF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 08:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.8] (c-24-4-109-25.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.109.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: drc) by trantor.virtualized.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 020A61705A; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 15:37:39 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1485\))
Subject: Re: ITU-T Dubai Meeting
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120802115334.04b486b8@resistor.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 08:37:39 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7557FA6E-827D-431F-B434-ACA619E1ACB2@virtualized.org>
References: <CAMm+LwhKUZK9RGSmrntB6ZZVfnXRsaZfUcpWvVhWnxWRgdBjbw@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120802115334.04b486b8@resistor.net>
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1485)
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 15:37:42 -0000

On Aug 2, 2012, at 12:55 PM, SM <sm@resistor.net> wrote:
> If the ITU-T wants a /16 it is simply a matter of asking the IETF for it.

And, unless the reason the ITU-T was requesting the /16 was for some protocol that came up with that has global applicability that needed a /16 of IPv6 space, they'd be redirected to an RIR.

Regards,
-drc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email